River Drainage Reorganization and Reticulate Evolution in the Two-Lined Salamander (Eurycea bislineata) Species Complex

Todd W. Pierson, Kenneth H. Kozak, Travis C. Glenn, Benjamin M. Fitzpatrick

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The origin and eventual loss of biogeographic barriers can create alternating periods of allopatry and secondary contact, facilitating gene flow among distinct metapopulations and generating reticulate evolutionary histories that are not adequately described by a bifurcating evolutionary tree. One such example may exist in the two-lined salamander (Eurycea bislineata) species complex, where discordance among morphological and molecular datasets has created a "vexing taxonomic challenge."Previous phylogeographic analyses of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) suggested that the reorganization of Miocene paleodrainages drove vicariance and dispersal, but the inherent limitations of a single-locus dataset precluded the evaluation of subsequent gene flow. Here, we generate triple-enzyme restriction site-associated DNA sequencing (3RAD) data for > 100 individuals representing all major mtDNA lineages and use a suite of complementary methods to demonstrate that discordance among earlier datasets is best explained by a reticulate evolutionary history influenced by river drainage reorganization. Systematics of such groups should acknowledge these complex histories and relationships that are not strictly hierarchical.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)26-35
Number of pages10
JournalSystematic Biology
Volume73
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s).

Keywords

  • Amphibian
  • hybridization
  • introgression
  • Plethodontidae
  • stream capture

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'River Drainage Reorganization and Reticulate Evolution in the Two-Lined Salamander (Eurycea bislineata) Species Complex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this