Abstract
This study examined risk, vulnerability, and protective processes of parental expressed emotion for children’s peer relationships in families living in emergency shelters with high rates of exposure to parental violence (EPV). Parental criticism and negativity were hypothesized to exacerbate the association between EPV and poorer peer relations, whereas parental warmth was expected to buffer this association. Participants included 138 homeless parents (M = 30.77 years, SD = 6.33, range = 20.51–57.32 years; 64% African American, 12% Caucasian, 24% other) and their 4-to 6-year-old children (43.5% male; M = 4.83, SD = .58, range = 4.83–6.92 years; 67% African American, 2% Caucasian, 31% other). Families were assessed during the summer at three urban shelters, with parents completing the Five-Minute Speech Sample (FMSS), later scored for criticism, negativity, and warmth, and interview items about EPV. Teachers were subsequently contacted in the fall about children’s classroom behavior, and they provided ratings of peer relations. Demographic factors, parental internalizing symptoms, and observed parental harshness were examined as covariates. Regression analyses indicated an interaction of EPV and warmth, consistent with a moderating effect of expressed emotion for EPV and peer relations, although no interactions were found for criticism or negativity. Observed harshness also directly predicted worse peer relations. Parental warmth may be protective for positive peer relations among impoverished families with high levels of EPV. The FMSS is discussed as an efficient tool with potential for both basic clinical research and preventative interventions designed to target or assess change in parental expressed emotion.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 676-688 |
| Number of pages | 13 |
| Journal | Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 4 2015 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:Preparation of this article was supported in part by a Graduate School Fellowship from the University of Minnesota awarded to A. Narayan; Graduate School Fellowships from the National Science Foundation to J. Sapienza and A. Monn; the Corcoran Graduate Fellowship from the University of Minnesota and the Elizabeth M. Koppitz Child Psychology Fellowship from the American Psychological Foundation to K. Lingras; and grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF No. 0745643) and the 2011/2012 Fesler-Lampert Chair in Urban and Regional Affairs at the University of Minnesota to A. Masten, as well as funding from the Center on Personalized Prevention Research (NIMH #P20 MH085987; PI Gerald August) to A. Masten. Any opinions, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the NSF, APF, NIMH, or the University of Minnesota. We express our deep appreciation for the contributions and support of the families, teachers, principals, and community collaborators in the Twin Cities metropolitan area who made this study possible.
Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
Copyright:
Copyright 2015 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
