Rice gelatinization temperature prediction using the rapid visco analyzer vis-à-vis the traditional DSC method

Evans A. Owusu, Samantha Scott, Kaushik Luthra, Seth Graham-Acquah, Robin January, George A. Annor, Griffiths Atungulu

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background and Objectives: The measurement of gelatinization temperatures (GTs) of rice using the Rapid Visco Analyzer (RVA) can be a more rapid and efficient method as compared to the traditional method of using Differential Scanning Calorimeter (DSC). The objective of this research was to determine the accuracy and precision of the RVA technique in comparison to the DSC method for measuring GTs of contemporary rice cultivars produced in Arkansas. Findings: Rice samples analyzed using the RVA had GT that ranged from 70.48 ± 0.18°C to 75.72 ± 0.11°C, while the DSC-analyzed samples had GT that ranged from 67.25 ± 0.18°C to 74.72 ± 0.64°C. The values of RVA GT consistently overestimated the values of the DSC-GT, with the RVA GT values demonstrating higher precision. A calibration equation was developed to correct the overestimation of RVA GT values, and its validity was confirmed through data obtained from both laboratory-scale tests and industry-based analysis. Conclusions: The method of using RVA can serve as a standalone approach for determining the GT of rice from various cultivars. Significance and Novelty: This technique of using RVA can be beneficial to industrial and educational applications because it is less expensive, easier to follow, and more rapid in analysis as compared to DSC.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)622-629
Number of pages8
JournalCereal Chemistry
Volume101
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Cereals & Grains Association.

Keywords

  • RVA method
  • prediction model
  • rice gelatinization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rice gelatinization temperature prediction using the rapid visco analyzer vis-à-vis the traditional DSC method'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this