Abstract
Public diplomacy, the process by which direct relations are pursued with a country’s people to advance the interests and extend the values of those being represented, appears to be an idea whose time has come. The consensus is that it is made necessary by economic interdependence, possible by the communications revolution, and desirable by the rise in democratic and popular expectations. Even the emerging civilizational wars, which some argue are disrupting this picture, do not tell against public diplomacy, in fact quite the reverse. In the aftermath of the events of 11 September 2001, governments, it is now customary to argue, will have to conduct more public diplomacy and become better at it.1 However, this consensus about the importance of public diplomacy is not matched by a similar consensus regarding the consequences of its use for what remains an international society of states.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Pages | 106-123 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2005 |
Publication series
| Name | Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations |
|---|---|
| ISSN (Print) | 2731-3921 |
| ISSN (Electronic) | 2731-393X |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2005, Paul Sharp.
Keywords
- Commanding Officer
- Foreign Policy
- Friday Prayer
- October Revolution
- Public Diplomacy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Revolutionary States, Outlaw Regimes and the Techniques of Public Diplomacy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS