Abstract
Capture-based studies of the Western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population in Canada have reported declines in abundance, survival, and body condition, but these findings are inconsistent with the perceptions of local people. To address this uncertainty about current status, we conducted a comprehensive aerial survey of this population during August, 2011, when the region was ice-free and bears were on shore. We flew a combination of overland transects oriented perpendicular to the coastline, coastal transects parallel to shore, and transects across small islands. We used distance sampling and sight-resight protocols to estimate abundance. Bears were concentrated along the coast in central and southern Manitoba and Ontario portions of the population, although sightings >10. km inland were not uncommon in central Manitoba. We analyzed 2 combinations of data and derived an abundance estimate of 1030 bears (95% CI: ~754-1406). This figure is similar to a 2004 mark-recapture estimate but higher than projections indicating declining abundance since then. Our results suggest that mark-recapture estimates may have been negatively biased due to limited spatial sampling. We observed large numbers of bears summering in southeastern WH, an area not regularly sampled by mark-recapture. Consequently, previous mark-recapture estimates are not directly comparable to our aerial survey of the entire population. Whereas our results do not necessarily contradict the reported declines in this population, we believe that improvements are needed in monitoring, and methodological limitations and inconsistencies must be resolved to accurately assess status and the impacts of climate change.
| Language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages | 38-47 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Biological Conservation |
| Volume | 170 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 1 2014 |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- Abundance estimation
- Aerial survey
- Distance sampling
- Hudson Bay
- Marine mammal
- Mark-recapture
Cite this
Revisiting Western Hudson Bay : Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population. / Stapleton, Seth; Atkinson, Stephen; Hedman, Daryll; Garshelis, David.
In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 170, 01.02.2014, p. 38-47.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Revisiting Western Hudson Bay
T2 - Biological Conservation
AU - Stapleton,Seth
AU - Atkinson,Stephen
AU - Hedman,Daryll
AU - Garshelis,David
PY - 2014/2/1
Y1 - 2014/2/1
N2 - Capture-based studies of the Western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population in Canada have reported declines in abundance, survival, and body condition, but these findings are inconsistent with the perceptions of local people. To address this uncertainty about current status, we conducted a comprehensive aerial survey of this population during August, 2011, when the region was ice-free and bears were on shore. We flew a combination of overland transects oriented perpendicular to the coastline, coastal transects parallel to shore, and transects across small islands. We used distance sampling and sight-resight protocols to estimate abundance. Bears were concentrated along the coast in central and southern Manitoba and Ontario portions of the population, although sightings >10. km inland were not uncommon in central Manitoba. We analyzed 2 combinations of data and derived an abundance estimate of 1030 bears (95% CI: ~754-1406). This figure is similar to a 2004 mark-recapture estimate but higher than projections indicating declining abundance since then. Our results suggest that mark-recapture estimates may have been negatively biased due to limited spatial sampling. We observed large numbers of bears summering in southeastern WH, an area not regularly sampled by mark-recapture. Consequently, previous mark-recapture estimates are not directly comparable to our aerial survey of the entire population. Whereas our results do not necessarily contradict the reported declines in this population, we believe that improvements are needed in monitoring, and methodological limitations and inconsistencies must be resolved to accurately assess status and the impacts of climate change.
AB - Capture-based studies of the Western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population in Canada have reported declines in abundance, survival, and body condition, but these findings are inconsistent with the perceptions of local people. To address this uncertainty about current status, we conducted a comprehensive aerial survey of this population during August, 2011, when the region was ice-free and bears were on shore. We flew a combination of overland transects oriented perpendicular to the coastline, coastal transects parallel to shore, and transects across small islands. We used distance sampling and sight-resight protocols to estimate abundance. Bears were concentrated along the coast in central and southern Manitoba and Ontario portions of the population, although sightings >10. km inland were not uncommon in central Manitoba. We analyzed 2 combinations of data and derived an abundance estimate of 1030 bears (95% CI: ~754-1406). This figure is similar to a 2004 mark-recapture estimate but higher than projections indicating declining abundance since then. Our results suggest that mark-recapture estimates may have been negatively biased due to limited spatial sampling. We observed large numbers of bears summering in southeastern WH, an area not regularly sampled by mark-recapture. Consequently, previous mark-recapture estimates are not directly comparable to our aerial survey of the entire population. Whereas our results do not necessarily contradict the reported declines in this population, we believe that improvements are needed in monitoring, and methodological limitations and inconsistencies must be resolved to accurately assess status and the impacts of climate change.
KW - Abundance estimation
KW - Aerial survey
KW - Distance sampling
KW - Hudson Bay
KW - Marine mammal
KW - Mark-recapture
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893175492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893175492&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040
DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040
M3 - Article
VL - 170
SP - 38
EP - 47
JO - Biological Conservation
JF - Biological Conservation
SN - 0006-3207
ER -