Revisiting Western Hudson Bay: Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population

Seth Stapleton, Stephen Atkinson, Daryll Hedman, David Garshelis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

  • 14 Citations

Abstract

Capture-based studies of the Western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population in Canada have reported declines in abundance, survival, and body condition, but these findings are inconsistent with the perceptions of local people. To address this uncertainty about current status, we conducted a comprehensive aerial survey of this population during August, 2011, when the region was ice-free and bears were on shore. We flew a combination of overland transects oriented perpendicular to the coastline, coastal transects parallel to shore, and transects across small islands. We used distance sampling and sight-resight protocols to estimate abundance. Bears were concentrated along the coast in central and southern Manitoba and Ontario portions of the population, although sightings >10. km inland were not uncommon in central Manitoba. We analyzed 2 combinations of data and derived an abundance estimate of 1030 bears (95% CI: ~754-1406). This figure is similar to a 2004 mark-recapture estimate but higher than projections indicating declining abundance since then. Our results suggest that mark-recapture estimates may have been negatively biased due to limited spatial sampling. We observed large numbers of bears summering in southeastern WH, an area not regularly sampled by mark-recapture. Consequently, previous mark-recapture estimates are not directly comparable to our aerial survey of the entire population. Whereas our results do not necessarily contradict the reported declines in this population, we believe that improvements are needed in monitoring, and methodological limitations and inconsistencies must be resolved to accurately assess status and the impacts of climate change. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)38-47
Number of pages10
JournalBiological Conservation
Volume170
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2014

Fingerprint

transect
aerial survey
coast
sampling
body condition
bear
ice
climate change
monitoring

Keywords

  • Abundance estimation
  • Aerial survey
  • Distance sampling
  • Hudson Bay
  • Marine mammal
  • Mark-recapture

ASJC Scopus subject areas

  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Nature and Landscape Conservation

Cite this

Revisiting Western Hudson Bay : Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population. / Stapleton, Seth; Atkinson, Stephen; Hedman, Daryll; Garshelis, David.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 170, 02.2014, p. 38-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Stapleton, Seth; Atkinson, Stephen; Hedman, Daryll; Garshelis, David / Revisiting Western Hudson Bay : Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population.

In: Biological Conservation, Vol. 170, 02.2014, p. 38-47.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3db10c7036204c369bdff236ef029820,
title = "Revisiting Western Hudson Bay: Using aerial surveys to update polar bear abundance in a sentinel population",
keywords = "Abundance estimation, Aerial survey, Distance sampling, Hudson Bay, Marine mammal, Mark-recapture",
author = "Seth Stapleton and Stephen Atkinson and Daryll Hedman and David Garshelis",
year = "2014",
month = "2",
doi = "10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040",
volume = "170",
pages = "38--47",
journal = "Biological Conservation",
issn = "0006-3207",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Revisiting Western Hudson Bay

T2 - Biological Conservation

AU - Stapleton,Seth

AU - Atkinson,Stephen

AU - Hedman,Daryll

AU - Garshelis,David

PY - 2014/2

Y1 - 2014/2

N2 - Capture-based studies of the Western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population in Canada have reported declines in abundance, survival, and body condition, but these findings are inconsistent with the perceptions of local people. To address this uncertainty about current status, we conducted a comprehensive aerial survey of this population during August, 2011, when the region was ice-free and bears were on shore. We flew a combination of overland transects oriented perpendicular to the coastline, coastal transects parallel to shore, and transects across small islands. We used distance sampling and sight-resight protocols to estimate abundance. Bears were concentrated along the coast in central and southern Manitoba and Ontario portions of the population, although sightings >10. km inland were not uncommon in central Manitoba. We analyzed 2 combinations of data and derived an abundance estimate of 1030 bears (95% CI: ~754-1406). This figure is similar to a 2004 mark-recapture estimate but higher than projections indicating declining abundance since then. Our results suggest that mark-recapture estimates may have been negatively biased due to limited spatial sampling. We observed large numbers of bears summering in southeastern WH, an area not regularly sampled by mark-recapture. Consequently, previous mark-recapture estimates are not directly comparable to our aerial survey of the entire population. Whereas our results do not necessarily contradict the reported declines in this population, we believe that improvements are needed in monitoring, and methodological limitations and inconsistencies must be resolved to accurately assess status and the impacts of climate change. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

AB - Capture-based studies of the Western Hudson Bay (WH) polar bear population in Canada have reported declines in abundance, survival, and body condition, but these findings are inconsistent with the perceptions of local people. To address this uncertainty about current status, we conducted a comprehensive aerial survey of this population during August, 2011, when the region was ice-free and bears were on shore. We flew a combination of overland transects oriented perpendicular to the coastline, coastal transects parallel to shore, and transects across small islands. We used distance sampling and sight-resight protocols to estimate abundance. Bears were concentrated along the coast in central and southern Manitoba and Ontario portions of the population, although sightings >10. km inland were not uncommon in central Manitoba. We analyzed 2 combinations of data and derived an abundance estimate of 1030 bears (95% CI: ~754-1406). This figure is similar to a 2004 mark-recapture estimate but higher than projections indicating declining abundance since then. Our results suggest that mark-recapture estimates may have been negatively biased due to limited spatial sampling. We observed large numbers of bears summering in southeastern WH, an area not regularly sampled by mark-recapture. Consequently, previous mark-recapture estimates are not directly comparable to our aerial survey of the entire population. Whereas our results do not necessarily contradict the reported declines in this population, we believe that improvements are needed in monitoring, and methodological limitations and inconsistencies must be resolved to accurately assess status and the impacts of climate change. © 2014 Elsevier Ltd.

KW - Abundance estimation

KW - Aerial survey

KW - Distance sampling

KW - Hudson Bay

KW - Marine mammal

KW - Mark-recapture

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84893175492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84893175492&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040

DO - 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.12.040

M3 - Article

VL - 170

SP - 38

EP - 47

JO - Biological Conservation

JF - Biological Conservation

SN - 0006-3207

ER -