Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to explore curricular (re)visions made over the span of two semesters to a required secondary teacher education course. Specifically, we focus on our trials and triumphs in implementing the revised curricula. Our work is guided by the following question: in what ways do preservice teachers deem the diversity-focused course curriculum as relevant to their future teaching stances/ practices? Data collected illuminated the complexities of disrupting hegemonic understandings and performances of education. Some of the data indicated that preservice teachers deemed the diversity-focused course curriculum as relevant to and connected with their future teaching stances/practices. Other data highlighted that some preservice teachers' struggled with making sense of their future teaching practices in relation to issues of oppression and privilege, while other preservice teachers were resistant.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 135-149 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Teaching and Teacher Education |
| Volume | 22 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2006 |
| Externally published | Yes |
Keywords
- Curriculum
- Diversity
- Teacher education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '(Re)visions to a secondary teacher education course: Trials and triumphs in attempting to disrupt hegemonic understandings and performances of education'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS