Abstract
The majority of disucssions of Benardete’s Paradox conclude that the traveller approaching the infinite series of gods will be mysteriously halted despite none of the gods erecting any barriers. Using a revision-theoretic analysis of Benardete’s puzzle, four distinct possible outcomes that might occur given Benardete’s set-up are distinguished. This analysis provides additional insight into the puzzle at hand, via identifying heretofore unnoticed possible outcomes, but it also serves as an example of how the revision theoretic framework can be used to construct exhaustive taxonomies of potential outcomes in apparently contradictory situations.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 37-56 |
Number of pages | 20 |
Journal | Journal of Philosophical Logic |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 15 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2018, Springer Nature B.V.
Keywords
- Benardete’s paradox
- Impenetrability
- Infinity
- Revision theory
- Supertasks
- Zeno