Return-to-baseline multiple imputation for missing values in clinical trials

Yongming Qu, Biyue Dai

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Return-to-baseline is an important method to impute missing values or unobserved potential outcomes when certain hypothetical strategies are used to handle intercurrent events in clinical trials. Current return-to-baseline approaches seen in literature and in practice inflate the variability of the “complete” dataset after imputation and lead to biased mean estimators when the probability of missingness depends on the observed baseline and/or postbaseline intermediate outcomes. In this article, we first provide a set of criteria a return-to-baseline imputation method should satisfy. Under this framework, we propose a novel return-to-baseline imputation method. Simulations show the completed data after the new imputation approach have the proper distribution, and the estimators based on the new imputation method outperform the traditional method in terms of both bias and variance, when missingness depends on the observed values. The new method can be implemented easily with the existing multiple imputation procedures in commonly used statistical packages.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)641-653
Number of pages13
JournalPharmaceutical statistics
Volume21
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We would like to thank Ilya Lipkovich and Govinda Weerakkody for their useful comments and their careful review of this manuscript, and Dana Schamberger for an editorial review of the manuscript.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Keywords

  • baseline observation carried forward
  • direct maximum likelihood estimation
  • estimand
  • ignorable missingness

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Return-to-baseline multiple imputation for missing values in clinical trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this