Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study of Immediate Voiding at End of Urinary Sphincter Surgery (REMOVE)

  • Thomas Kozar
  • , John Michael Kaylor
  • , Cynthia Hinderscheid
  • , Jamee Schoephoerster
  • , Albert E. Holler
  • , Edward J. Wright
  • , Joseph J. Pariser
  • , William Boysen
  • , Lucas Wiegand
  • , J. Patrick Selph
  • , Andrew J. Cohen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose:Patients may remain catheterized after artificial urinary sphincter surgery to prevent urinary retention, despite a lack of evidence to support this practice. Our study aims to evaluate the feasibility of outpatient, catheter-free continence surgery using a multi-institutional database. We hypothesize that between catheterized controls and patients without a catheter, there would be no difference in the rate of urinary retention or postoperative complications.Materials and Methods:We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing first-time artificial urinary sphincter placement from 2009-2021. Patients were stratified by postoperative catheter status into either no-catheter (leaving the procedure without a catheter) or catheter (postoperative indwelling catheter for ∼24 hours). The primary outcome, urinary retention, was defined as catheterization due to subjective voiding difficulty or documented postvoid residual over 250 mL.Results:Our study identified 302 catheter and 123 no-catheter patients. Twenty (6.6%) catheter and 9 (7.3%) no-catheter patients developed urinary retention (P =.8). On multivariable analysis, controlling for age, cuff size, radiation history and surgeon, there was no statistically significant association between omitting a catheter and urinary retention (OR: 0.45, 95% CI: 0.13-1.58; P =.2). Furthermore, at 30 months follow-up, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that device survival was 70% (95% CI: 62%-76%) vs 69% (95% CI: 48%-82%) for the catheter and no-catheter group, respectively.Conclusions:In our multi-institutional cohort, overall retention rates were low (7%) in groups with a catheter and without. Obviating postoperative catheterization facilitates outpatient incontinence surgery without altering reoperation over medium-term follow-up.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)865-873
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume210
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2023

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Lippincott Williams and Wilkins. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • ambulatory surgical procedures
  • artificial
  • equipment failure
  • stress
  • urinary incontinence
  • urinary retention
  • urinary sphincter

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Retrospective Multicenter Observational Study of Immediate Voiding at End of Urinary Sphincter Surgery (REMOVE)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this