TY - JOUR
T1 - Retinal Anatomy and Electrode Array Position in Retinitis Pigmentosa Patients After Argus II Implantation
T2 - An International Study
AU - Gregori, Ninel Z.
AU - Callaway, Natalia F.
AU - Hoeppner, Catherine
AU - Yuan, Alex
AU - Rachitskaya, Aleksandra
AU - Feuer, William
AU - Ameri, Hossein
AU - Arevalo, J. Fernando
AU - Augustin, Albert J.
AU - Birch, David G.
AU - Dagnelie, Gislin
AU - Grisanti, Salvatore
AU - Davis, Janet L.
AU - Hahn, Paul
AU - Handa, James T.
AU - Ho, Allen C.
AU - Huang, Suber S.
AU - Humayun, Mark S.
AU - Iezzi, Raymond
AU - Jayasundera, K. Thiran
AU - Kokame, Gregg T.
AU - Lam, Byron L.
AU - Lim, Jennifer I.
AU - Mandava, Naresh
AU - Montezuma, Sandra R.
AU - Olmos de Koo, Lisa
AU - Szurman, Peter
AU - Vajzovic, Lejla
AU - Wiedemann, Peter
AU - Weiland, James
AU - Yan, Jiong
AU - Zacks, David N.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018
PY - 2018/9
Y1 - 2018/9
N2 - Purpose: To assess the retinal anatomy and array position in Argus II retinal prosthesis recipients. Design: Prospective, noncomparative cohort study. Methods: SETTING: International multicenter study. PATIENTS: Argus II recipients enrolled in the Post-Market Surveillance Studies. PROCEDURES: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images collected for the Surveillance Studies (NCT01860092 and NCT01490827) were reviewed. Baseline and postoperative macular thickness, electrode-retina distance (gap), optic disc–array overlap, and preretinal membrane presence were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axial retinal thickness and axial gap along the array's long axis (a line between the tack and handle); maximal retinal thickness and maximal gap along a B-scan near the tack, midline, and handle. Results: Thirty-three patients from 16 surgical sites in the United States and Germany were included. Mean axial retinal thickness increased from month 1 through month 12 at each location, but reached statistical significance only at the array midline (P =.007). The rate of maximal thickness increase was highest near the array midline (slope = 6.02, P =.004), compared to the tack (slope = 3.60, P <.001) or the handle (slope = 1.93, P =.368). The mean axial and maximal gaps decreased over the study period, and the mean maximal gap size decrease was significant at midline (P =.032). Optic disc–array overlap was seen in the minority of patients. Preretinal membranes were common before and after implantation. Conclusions: Progressive macular thickening under the array was common and corresponded to decreased electrode-retina gap over time. By month 12, the array was completely apposed to the macula in approximately half of the eyes.
AB - Purpose: To assess the retinal anatomy and array position in Argus II retinal prosthesis recipients. Design: Prospective, noncomparative cohort study. Methods: SETTING: International multicenter study. PATIENTS: Argus II recipients enrolled in the Post-Market Surveillance Studies. PROCEDURES: Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography images collected for the Surveillance Studies (NCT01860092 and NCT01490827) were reviewed. Baseline and postoperative macular thickness, electrode-retina distance (gap), optic disc–array overlap, and preretinal membrane presence were recorded at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Axial retinal thickness and axial gap along the array's long axis (a line between the tack and handle); maximal retinal thickness and maximal gap along a B-scan near the tack, midline, and handle. Results: Thirty-three patients from 16 surgical sites in the United States and Germany were included. Mean axial retinal thickness increased from month 1 through month 12 at each location, but reached statistical significance only at the array midline (P =.007). The rate of maximal thickness increase was highest near the array midline (slope = 6.02, P =.004), compared to the tack (slope = 3.60, P <.001) or the handle (slope = 1.93, P =.368). The mean axial and maximal gaps decreased over the study period, and the mean maximal gap size decrease was significant at midline (P =.032). Optic disc–array overlap was seen in the minority of patients. Preretinal membranes were common before and after implantation. Conclusions: Progressive macular thickening under the array was common and corresponded to decreased electrode-retina gap over time. By month 12, the array was completely apposed to the macula in approximately half of the eyes.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049424615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049424615&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.06.012
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2018.06.012
M3 - Article
C2 - 29940167
AN - SCOPUS:85049424615
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 193
SP - 87
EP - 99
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
ER -