Rethinking the Two-Body Problem: The Segregation of Women Into Geographically Dispersed Occupations

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

14 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Empirical research on the family cites the tendency for couples to relocate for husbands’ careers as evidence against the gender neutrality of household economic decisions. For these studies, occupational segregation is a concern because occupations are not random by sex and mobility is not random by occupation. I find that the tendency for households to relocate for husbands’ careers is better explained by the segregation of women into geographically dispersed occupations rather than by the direct prioritization of men’s careers. Among never-married workers, women relocate for work less often than men, and the gender effect disappears after occupational segregation is accounted for. Although most two-earner families feature husbands in geographically clustered jobs involving frequent relocation for work, families are no less likely to relocate for work when it belongs to the wife. I conclude that future research in household mobility should treat occupational segregation occurring prior to marriage rather than gender bias within married couples as the primary explanation for the prioritization of husbands’ careers in household mobility decisions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1619-1639
Number of pages21
JournalDemography
Volume51
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 23 2014

Fingerprint

husband
segregation
occupation
career
gender
married couple
family work
neutrality
move
empirical research
wife
marriage
worker
trend
evidence
economics

Keywords

  • Family
  • Household mobility
  • Occupational segregation

Cite this

Rethinking the Two-Body Problem : The Segregation of Women Into Geographically Dispersed Occupations. / Benson, Alan.

In: Demography, Vol. 51, No. 5, 23.10.2014, p. 1619-1639.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{780dbefeb723483f85abe3d003cb2d9d,
title = "Rethinking the Two-Body Problem: The Segregation of Women Into Geographically Dispersed Occupations",
abstract = "Empirical research on the family cites the tendency for couples to relocate for husbands’ careers as evidence against the gender neutrality of household economic decisions. For these studies, occupational segregation is a concern because occupations are not random by sex and mobility is not random by occupation. I find that the tendency for households to relocate for husbands’ careers is better explained by the segregation of women into geographically dispersed occupations rather than by the direct prioritization of men’s careers. Among never-married workers, women relocate for work less often than men, and the gender effect disappears after occupational segregation is accounted for. Although most two-earner families feature husbands in geographically clustered jobs involving frequent relocation for work, families are no less likely to relocate for work when it belongs to the wife. I conclude that future research in household mobility should treat occupational segregation occurring prior to marriage rather than gender bias within married couples as the primary explanation for the prioritization of husbands’ careers in household mobility decisions.",
keywords = "Family, Household mobility, Occupational segregation",
author = "Alan Benson",
year = "2014",
month = "10",
day = "23",
doi = "10.1007/s13524-014-0324-7",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "1619--1639",
journal = "Demography",
issn = "0070-3370",
publisher = "Springer New York",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rethinking the Two-Body Problem

T2 - The Segregation of Women Into Geographically Dispersed Occupations

AU - Benson, Alan

PY - 2014/10/23

Y1 - 2014/10/23

N2 - Empirical research on the family cites the tendency for couples to relocate for husbands’ careers as evidence against the gender neutrality of household economic decisions. For these studies, occupational segregation is a concern because occupations are not random by sex and mobility is not random by occupation. I find that the tendency for households to relocate for husbands’ careers is better explained by the segregation of women into geographically dispersed occupations rather than by the direct prioritization of men’s careers. Among never-married workers, women relocate for work less often than men, and the gender effect disappears after occupational segregation is accounted for. Although most two-earner families feature husbands in geographically clustered jobs involving frequent relocation for work, families are no less likely to relocate for work when it belongs to the wife. I conclude that future research in household mobility should treat occupational segregation occurring prior to marriage rather than gender bias within married couples as the primary explanation for the prioritization of husbands’ careers in household mobility decisions.

AB - Empirical research on the family cites the tendency for couples to relocate for husbands’ careers as evidence against the gender neutrality of household economic decisions. For these studies, occupational segregation is a concern because occupations are not random by sex and mobility is not random by occupation. I find that the tendency for households to relocate for husbands’ careers is better explained by the segregation of women into geographically dispersed occupations rather than by the direct prioritization of men’s careers. Among never-married workers, women relocate for work less often than men, and the gender effect disappears after occupational segregation is accounted for. Although most two-earner families feature husbands in geographically clustered jobs involving frequent relocation for work, families are no less likely to relocate for work when it belongs to the wife. I conclude that future research in household mobility should treat occupational segregation occurring prior to marriage rather than gender bias within married couples as the primary explanation for the prioritization of husbands’ careers in household mobility decisions.

KW - Family

KW - Household mobility

KW - Occupational segregation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84910022567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84910022567&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/s13524-014-0324-7

DO - 10.1007/s13524-014-0324-7

M3 - Article

C2 - 25189156

AN - SCOPUS:84910022567

VL - 51

SP - 1619

EP - 1639

JO - Demography

JF - Demography

SN - 0070-3370

IS - 5

ER -