Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court: Retributive or Restorative Responses to Youth Crime

Gordon Bazemore, Mark Umbreit

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

117 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although juvenile courts have always administered punishment to youthful offenders, parens patriae and the individual treatment mission have historically assigned an ambivalent role to sanctioning. In the absence of a coherent sanctioning framework, a punitive model has recently gained dominance over dispositional decision making in juvenile court. This article examines the limitations of sanctioning choices presented by both the individual treatment mission and what some have referred to as a “retributive justice” paradigm. We then consider the implications of an alternative model—restorative justice—as a framework for a new approach to sanctioning consistent with a revitalized juvenile justice mandate. © 1995, SAGE Periodicals Press. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296-316
Number of pages21
JournalCrime and Delinquency
Volume41
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court: Retributive or Restorative Responses to Youth Crime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this