Results of introducing a rapid recovery program for total abdominal hysterectomy

Elizabeth Dickson, Peter A. Argenta, John A. Reichert

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

27 Scopus citations


Objective: To review the impact of implementing a rapid recovery protocol (RRP) for patients undergoing abdominal hysterectomy. Setting: Metropolitan teaching hospital. Population: Women undergoing abdominal hysterectomy for non-malignant indications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive cases performed during study periods before and after the introduction of an elective rapid recovery program emphasizing regional anesthesia. To control for universal improvements in medical practice, charts from a comparable local hospital without an RRP were also reviewed. Results: 400 charts were reviewed and 366 cases met inclusion criteria and had sufficient information. Patients were well matched for demographic and medical variables between the study periods and between the institutions. The median length of stay (LOS) fell dramatically from 3 (range 1-12) days prior to RRP introduction to 1 (range 1-17) day after RRP (p < 0.001). LOS among patients at the 'control' institution remained unchanged at 3 days during the same time frame, indicating that external pressures contributed minimally to the observed changes. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, duration of surgery, or complication rate between the groups in either time period. Conclusions: Introducing a rapid recovery program was associated with shorter hospitalization and did not appear to compromise surgical outcome.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)21-25
Number of pages5
JournalGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
Issue number1
StatePublished - Jan 2012


  • Anesthesia
  • Hysterectomy
  • Rapid recovery protocol
  • Surgery
  • fast track
  • regional


Dive into the research topics of 'Results of introducing a rapid recovery program for total abdominal hysterectomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this