TY - JOUR
T1 - Restrictive eating in anorexia nervosa
T2 - Examining maintenance and consequences in the natural environment
AU - Fitzsimmons-Craft, Ellen E.
AU - Accurso, Erin C.
AU - Ciao, Anna C.
AU - Crosby, Ross D.
AU - Cao, Li
AU - Pisetsky, Emily M.
AU - Le Grange, Daniel
AU - Peterson, Carol B.
AU - Crow, Scott J.
AU - Engel, Scott G.
AU - Mitchell, James E.
AU - Wonderlich, Stephen A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2015/11
Y1 - 2015/11
N2 - Objective This study examined negative and positive affect in relation to restrictive eating episodes (i.e., meals/snacks perceived as restrictive) and whether restrictive eating was associated with likelihood of subsequent eating disorder behaviors (i.e., additional restrictive eating, binge eating, vomiting, laxative use, weighing, exercising, meal skipping, drinking fluids to curb appetite, body checking). Method Women with anorexia nervosa (N-=-118) completed a 2-week ecological momentary assessment protocol. Results For both restrictive and nonrestrictive eating, negative affect significantly increased from prebehavior to the time of the behavior but remained stable thereafter, while positive affect remained stable from prebehavior to the time of the behavior but decreased significantly thereafter. Across time, negative affect was significantly lower and positive affect was significantly greater in restrictive than nonrestrictive episodes. Engagement in restrictive eating was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent restrictive eating, laxative use, and body checking, but not other behaviors. Engagement in nonrestrictive eating was associated with a decreased likelihood of subsequent restrictive eating, binge eating, vomiting, laxative use, weighing, meal skipping, drinking fluids to curb appetite, and body checking. Discussion Despite similar patterns of affect across eating episodes over time, results suggest affect may be involved in the maintenance of restrictive eating in anorexia nervosa since restrictive episodes were associated with lower negative and greater positive affect across time compared to nonrestrictive episodes. Further, while restrictive episodes increased the likelihood of only three subsequent eating disorder behaviors, nonrestrictive episodes were protective since they decreased likelihood of all but one behavior.
AB - Objective This study examined negative and positive affect in relation to restrictive eating episodes (i.e., meals/snacks perceived as restrictive) and whether restrictive eating was associated with likelihood of subsequent eating disorder behaviors (i.e., additional restrictive eating, binge eating, vomiting, laxative use, weighing, exercising, meal skipping, drinking fluids to curb appetite, body checking). Method Women with anorexia nervosa (N-=-118) completed a 2-week ecological momentary assessment protocol. Results For both restrictive and nonrestrictive eating, negative affect significantly increased from prebehavior to the time of the behavior but remained stable thereafter, while positive affect remained stable from prebehavior to the time of the behavior but decreased significantly thereafter. Across time, negative affect was significantly lower and positive affect was significantly greater in restrictive than nonrestrictive episodes. Engagement in restrictive eating was associated with an increased likelihood of subsequent restrictive eating, laxative use, and body checking, but not other behaviors. Engagement in nonrestrictive eating was associated with a decreased likelihood of subsequent restrictive eating, binge eating, vomiting, laxative use, weighing, meal skipping, drinking fluids to curb appetite, and body checking. Discussion Despite similar patterns of affect across eating episodes over time, results suggest affect may be involved in the maintenance of restrictive eating in anorexia nervosa since restrictive episodes were associated with lower negative and greater positive affect across time compared to nonrestrictive episodes. Further, while restrictive episodes increased the likelihood of only three subsequent eating disorder behaviors, nonrestrictive episodes were protective since they decreased likelihood of all but one behavior.
KW - anorexia nervosa
KW - ecological momentary assessment
KW - negative affect
KW - positive affect
KW - restrictive eating
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84945489062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84945489062&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/eat.22439
DO - 10.1002/eat.22439
M3 - Article
C2 - 26310991
AN - SCOPUS:84945489062
SN - 0276-3478
VL - 48
SP - 923
EP - 931
JO - International Journal of Eating Disorders
JF - International Journal of Eating Disorders
IS - 7
ER -