Responsive neurostimulation as a treatment for super-refractory focal status epilepticus: a systematic review and case series

Lia D. Ernst, Ahmed M. Raslan, Angela Wabulya, Hae Won Shin, Sydney S. Cash, Jimmy C. Yang, Vishwanath Sagi, David King-Stephens, Eyiyemisi C. Damisah, Alexander Ramos, Batool Hussain, Sheela Toprani, David M. Brandman, Kiarash Shahlaie, Kiran Kanth, Amir Arain, Angela Peters, John D. Rolston, Meaghan Berns, Sima I. PatelUtku Uysal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

OBJECTIVE Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) has high rates of morbidity and mortality. Few published studies have investigated neurostimulation treatment options in the setting of SRSE. This systematic literature review and series of 10 cases investigated the safety and efficacy of implanting and activating the responsive neurostimulation (RNS) system acutely during SRSE and discusses the rationale for lead placement and selection of stimulation parameters. METHODS Through a literature search (of databases and American Epilepsy Society abstracts that were last searched on March 1, 2023) and direct contact with the manufacturer of the RNS system, 10 total cases were identified that utilized RNS acutely during SE (9 SRSE cases and 1 case of refractory SE [RSE]). Nine centers obtained IRB approval for retrospective chart review and completed data collection forms. A tenth case had published data from a case report that were referenced in this study. Data from the collection forms and the published case report were compiled in Excel. RESULTS All 10 cases presented with focal SE: 9 with SRSE and 1 with RSE. Etiology varied from known lesion (focal cortical dysplasia in 7 cases and recurrent meningioma in 1) to unknown (2 cases, with 1 presenting with new-onset refractory focal SE [NORSE]). Seven of 10 cases exited SRSE after RNS placement and activation, with a time frame ranging from 1 to 27 days. Two patients died of complications due to ongoing SRSE. Another patient’s SE never resolved but was subclinical. One of 10 cases had a device-related significant adverse event (trace hemorrhage), which did not require intervention. There was 1 reported recurrence of SE after discharge among the cases in which SRSE resolved up to the defined endpoint. CONCLUSIONS This case series offers preliminary evidence that RNS is a safe and potentially effective treatment option for SRSE in patients with 1–2 well-defined seizure-onset zone(s) who meet the eligibility criteria for RNS. The unique features of RNS offer multiple benefits in the SRSE setting, including real-time electrocorticography to supplement scalp EEG for monitoring SRSE progress and response to treatment, as well as numerous stimulation options. Further research is indicated to investigate the optimal stimulation settings in this unique clinical scenario.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)201-209
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of neurosurgery
Volume140
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Association of Neurological Surgeons. All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Responsive neurostimulation
  • epilepsy
  • focal status epilepticus
  • super-refractory status epilepticus

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Case Reports
  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Responsive neurostimulation as a treatment for super-refractory focal status epilepticus: a systematic review and case series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this