Response to “Response to Fulk et al's ‘Geographic practice preferences of graduating medical students pursuing careers in dermatology’”

Katelyn J. Rypka, Travis S. Fulk, Laurel L. Wessman, Rachit Gupta, Robert T. Brodell, Ronda S. Farah, Cindy Firkins Smith, Kevin J. Gaddis, Matthew Mansh

Research output: Contribution to journalLetterpeer-review

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e199-e200
JournalJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology
Issue number5
StatePublished - Nov 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Dr Mansh is supported by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (U01ES029603). The content of this response letter does not necessarily represent the official view of the National Institutes of Health but is the sole responsibility of the authors. Dr Brodell is a principal investigator for a clinical trial (Novartis) and for the CorEvitas psoriasis biologic registry and serves on editorial boards of American Medical Student Research (faculty advisor), Practice Update Dermatology (Editor-in-Chief), Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology (Associate Editor), Practical Dermatology, Journal of the Mississippi State Medical Society, SKIN: The Journal of Cutaneous Medicine, and Archives of Dermatological Research. Author Rypka and Drs Fulk, Wessman, Gupta, Farah, Smith, and Gaddis have no conflicts of interest to declare.


  • dermatology residency
  • dermatology workforce
  • geographic maldistribution
  • graduate medical education
  • holistic review
  • medical school admissions
  • medical students
  • residency admissions
  • rural dermatology

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Letter
  • Comment

Cite this