Response to comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"

Gina E. Moseley, Yuri V. Dublyansky, R. Lawrence Edwards, Kathleen A. Wendt, Mathieu Pythoud, Pu Zhang, Hai Cheng, Yanbin Lu, Ronny Boch, Christoph Spötl

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

Abstract

Winograd and Coplen question the thorium-230 distribution model proposed to explain the age bias observed with increasing depth during Termination II. We have evaluated both criticisms and find that all samples display virtually identical fabrics, argue that the modern setting is not analogous to the conditions during Termination II, and reiterate the robustness of our age models. Our conclusions remain unchanged.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)296e
JournalScience
Volume354
Issue number6310
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 21 2016

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to comments on "Reconciliation of the Devils Hole climate record with orbital forcing"'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this