Response to Comment on "Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment

Peter B. Reich, Sarah E. Hobbie, Tali D. Lee, Melissa A. Pastore

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Nie and colleagues suggest a key role for interannual climate variation as an explanation for the temporal dynamics of an unexpected 20-year reversal of biomass responses of C3-C4 grasses to elevated CO2. However,we had already identified some climate-dependent differences in C3 and C4 responses to eCO2 and shown that these could not fully explain the temporal dynamics we observed.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numberaau8982
JournalScience
Volume361
Issue number6407
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 14 2018

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Response to Comment on "Unexpected reversal of C<sub>3</sub> versus C<sub>4</sub> grass response to elevated CO<sub>2</sub> during a 20-year field experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this