Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Response of adult lean and obese female Zucker rats to intermittent food restriction/refeeding

  • M. P. Cleary

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Previously, it was found that lean and obese Zucker rats (9-15 wk of age) responded differently to the first of four cycles of food restriction/refeeding. In later cycles, they responded similarly. The present study was undertaken to determine if this finding was due to age, adaption to the intervention or the obesity. Adult (35-wk-old) lean and obese rats were classified into four groups, ad libitum-fed lean and obese and food-restricted lean and obese. Food-restricted rats underwent four 3-wk periods when they were fed 50% of their ad libitum intake, each followed by a 3-wk period of ad libitum refeeding. Food-restricted rats lost and regained sufficient weight in each cycle to weigh a similar amount as their ad libitum-fed groups by the end of each refeeding period. In lean rats, there were no permanent effects of this intervention except for a 25% reduction in carbohydrate intake. Similar results were found in obese rats, although they did have significantly lower retroperitoneal fat pad weight and serum triacylglycerol levels than ad libitum-fed obese rats at the end of the experiment. These results indicate that lean and obese adult rats respond to each food restriction/refeeding cycle in a similar manner. Results in the earlier experiment would appear to be due both to age and genotype.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1489-1499
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Nutrition
Volume116
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - 1986
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Response of adult lean and obese female Zucker rats to intermittent food restriction/refeeding'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this