Resource use patterns predict long-term outcomes of plant competition for nutrients and light

Ray Dybzinski, David Tilman

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

92 Scopus citations

Abstract

An 11-year competition experiment among combinations of six prairie perennial plant species showed that resource competition theory generally predicted the long-term outcome of competition. We grew each species in replicated monocultures to determine its requirements for soil nitrate (R*) and light (I*). In six pairwise combinations, the species with the lower R* and I* excluded its competitor, as predicted by theory. In the remaining two pairwise combinations, one species had a lower R*, and the second had a lower I*; these species pairs coexisted, although it is unclear whether resource competition alone was responsible for their coexistence. Smaller differences in R* or I* between competing species led to slower rates of competitive exclusion, and the influence of R* differences on the rate of competitive exclusion was more pronounced on low-nitrogen soils, while the influence of I* differences was more pronounced on high-nitrogen (low-light) soils. These results were not explained by differences in initial species abundances or neutrality. However, only a few of our paired species coexisted under our experimentally imposed conditions (homogeneous soils, high seeding densities, minimal disturbance, regular water, and low herbivory levels), suggesting that other coexistence mechanisms help generate the diversity observed in natural communities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-318
Number of pages14
JournalAmerican Naturalist
Volume170
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Bibliographical note

Copyright:
Copyright 2008 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • Competition
  • Light
  • Nitrogen
  • Resource

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Resource use patterns predict long-term outcomes of plant competition for nutrients and light'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this