Republican states bolstered their health insurance rate review programs using incentives from the Affordable Care Act

Brent D. Fulton, Ann Hollingshead, Pinar Karaca-Mandic, Richard M. Scheffler

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act (ACA) included financial and regulatory incentives and goals for states to bolster their health insurance rate review programs, increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements, expand Medicaid, and establish statebased exchanges. We grouped states by political party control and compared their reactions across these policy goals. To identify changes in states' rate review programs and anticipated loss ratio requirements in the individual and small group markets since the ACA's enactment, we conducted legal research and contacted each state's insurance regulator. We linked rate review program changes to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) criteria for an effective rate review program. We found, of states that did not meet CMS's criteria when the ACA was enacted, most made changes to meet those criteria, including Republican-controlled states, which generally oppose the ACA. This finding is likely the result of the relatively low administrative burden associated with reviewing health insurance rates and the fact that doing so prevents federal intervention in rate review. However, Republican-controlled states were less likely than non-Republicancontrolled states to increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements to align with the federal retrospective medical loss ratio requirement, expand Medicaid, and establish state-based exchanges, because of their general opposition to the ACA. We conclude that federal incentives for states to strengthen their health insurance rate review programs were more effective than the incentives for states to adopt other insurance-related policy goals of the ACA.

Original languageEnglish (US)
JournalInquiry (United States)
Volume52
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2015

Fingerprint

Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
Health Insurance
Motivation
Medicaid
Insurance
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (U.S.)
Research

Keywords

  • Affordable Care Act
  • Federalism
  • Health care reform
  • Health insurance rate review
  • Policy implementation
  • Politics

Cite this

Republican states bolstered their health insurance rate review programs using incentives from the Affordable Care Act. / Fulton, Brent D.; Hollingshead, Ann; Karaca-Mandic, Pinar; Scheffler, Richard M.

In: Inquiry (United States), Vol. 52, 01.01.2015.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{fde638acc4524f0e97317ef4be05f29c,
title = "Republican states bolstered their health insurance rate review programs using incentives from the Affordable Care Act",
abstract = "The Affordable Care Act (ACA) included financial and regulatory incentives and goals for states to bolster their health insurance rate review programs, increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements, expand Medicaid, and establish statebased exchanges. We grouped states by political party control and compared their reactions across these policy goals. To identify changes in states' rate review programs and anticipated loss ratio requirements in the individual and small group markets since the ACA's enactment, we conducted legal research and contacted each state's insurance regulator. We linked rate review program changes to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) criteria for an effective rate review program. We found, of states that did not meet CMS's criteria when the ACA was enacted, most made changes to meet those criteria, including Republican-controlled states, which generally oppose the ACA. This finding is likely the result of the relatively low administrative burden associated with reviewing health insurance rates and the fact that doing so prevents federal intervention in rate review. However, Republican-controlled states were less likely than non-Republicancontrolled states to increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements to align with the federal retrospective medical loss ratio requirement, expand Medicaid, and establish state-based exchanges, because of their general opposition to the ACA. We conclude that federal incentives for states to strengthen their health insurance rate review programs were more effective than the incentives for states to adopt other insurance-related policy goals of the ACA.",
keywords = "Affordable Care Act, Federalism, Health care reform, Health insurance rate review, Policy implementation, Politics",
author = "Fulton, {Brent D.} and Ann Hollingshead and Pinar Karaca-Mandic and Scheffler, {Richard M.}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/0046958015604164",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "52",
journal = "Inquiry (United States)",
issn = "0046-9580",
publisher = "Excellus Health Plan",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Republican states bolstered their health insurance rate review programs using incentives from the Affordable Care Act

AU - Fulton, Brent D.

AU - Hollingshead, Ann

AU - Karaca-Mandic, Pinar

AU - Scheffler, Richard M.

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) included financial and regulatory incentives and goals for states to bolster their health insurance rate review programs, increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements, expand Medicaid, and establish statebased exchanges. We grouped states by political party control and compared their reactions across these policy goals. To identify changes in states' rate review programs and anticipated loss ratio requirements in the individual and small group markets since the ACA's enactment, we conducted legal research and contacted each state's insurance regulator. We linked rate review program changes to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) criteria for an effective rate review program. We found, of states that did not meet CMS's criteria when the ACA was enacted, most made changes to meet those criteria, including Republican-controlled states, which generally oppose the ACA. This finding is likely the result of the relatively low administrative burden associated with reviewing health insurance rates and the fact that doing so prevents federal intervention in rate review. However, Republican-controlled states were less likely than non-Republicancontrolled states to increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements to align with the federal retrospective medical loss ratio requirement, expand Medicaid, and establish state-based exchanges, because of their general opposition to the ACA. We conclude that federal incentives for states to strengthen their health insurance rate review programs were more effective than the incentives for states to adopt other insurance-related policy goals of the ACA.

AB - The Affordable Care Act (ACA) included financial and regulatory incentives and goals for states to bolster their health insurance rate review programs, increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements, expand Medicaid, and establish statebased exchanges. We grouped states by political party control and compared their reactions across these policy goals. To identify changes in states' rate review programs and anticipated loss ratio requirements in the individual and small group markets since the ACA's enactment, we conducted legal research and contacted each state's insurance regulator. We linked rate review program changes to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' (CMS) criteria for an effective rate review program. We found, of states that did not meet CMS's criteria when the ACA was enacted, most made changes to meet those criteria, including Republican-controlled states, which generally oppose the ACA. This finding is likely the result of the relatively low administrative burden associated with reviewing health insurance rates and the fact that doing so prevents federal intervention in rate review. However, Republican-controlled states were less likely than non-Republicancontrolled states to increase their anticipated loss ratio requirements to align with the federal retrospective medical loss ratio requirement, expand Medicaid, and establish state-based exchanges, because of their general opposition to the ACA. We conclude that federal incentives for states to strengthen their health insurance rate review programs were more effective than the incentives for states to adopt other insurance-related policy goals of the ACA.

KW - Affordable Care Act

KW - Federalism

KW - Health care reform

KW - Health insurance rate review

KW - Policy implementation

KW - Politics

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84982763171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84982763171&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0046958015604164

DO - 10.1177/0046958015604164

M3 - Article

C2 - 26396089

AN - SCOPUS:84982763171

VL - 52

JO - Inquiry (United States)

JF - Inquiry (United States)

SN - 0046-9580

ER -