TY - JOUR
T1 - Reporting Practice in Multilevel Modeling
T2 - A Revisit After 10 Years
AU - Luo, Wen
AU - Li, Haoran
AU - Baek, Eunkyeng
AU - Chen, Siqi
AU - Lam, Kwok Hap
AU - Semma, Brandie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 AERA.
PY - 2021/6
Y1 - 2021/6
N2 - Multilevel modeling (MLM) is a statistical technique for analyzing clustered data. Despite its long history, the technique and accompanying computer programs are rapidly evolving. Given the complexity of multilevel models, it is crucial for researchers to provide complete and transparent descriptions of the data, statistical analyses, and results. Ten years have passed since the guidelines for reporting multilevel studies were initially published. This study reviewed new advancements in MLM and revisited the reporting practice in MLM in the past decade. A total of 301 articles from 19 journals representing different subdisciplines in education and psychology were included in the systematic review. The results showed improvement in some areas of the reporting practices, such as the number of models tested, centering of predictors, missing data treatment, software, and estimates of variance components. However, poor practices persist in terms of model specification, description of a missing mechanism, power analysis, assumption checking, model comparisons, and effect sizes. Updates on the guidelines for reporting multilevel studies and recommendations for future methodological research in MLM are presented.
AB - Multilevel modeling (MLM) is a statistical technique for analyzing clustered data. Despite its long history, the technique and accompanying computer programs are rapidly evolving. Given the complexity of multilevel models, it is crucial for researchers to provide complete and transparent descriptions of the data, statistical analyses, and results. Ten years have passed since the guidelines for reporting multilevel studies were initially published. This study reviewed new advancements in MLM and revisited the reporting practice in MLM in the past decade. A total of 301 articles from 19 journals representing different subdisciplines in education and psychology were included in the systematic review. The results showed improvement in some areas of the reporting practices, such as the number of models tested, centering of predictors, missing data treatment, software, and estimates of variance components. However, poor practices persist in terms of model specification, description of a missing mechanism, power analysis, assumption checking, model comparisons, and effect sizes. Updates on the guidelines for reporting multilevel studies and recommendations for future methodological research in MLM are presented.
KW - methodological development
KW - multilevel modeling
KW - reporting practices
KW - systematic review
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100592982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85100592982&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3102/0034654321991229
DO - 10.3102/0034654321991229
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85100592982
SN - 0034-6543
VL - 91
SP - 311
EP - 355
JO - Review of Educational Research
JF - Review of Educational Research
IS - 3
ER -