Reply to ‘Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” ’

S. K. Hui; A. K. Sinha; M. Thoennessen; G. Gervais; A. K. Ganguly; N. Madhavan; S. Murlithar; D. O. Kataria; C. R. Bhuinya; Lagy T. Baby; Vandana Tripathi; P. V. Madhusudhana Rao; N. V.S.V. Prasad; A. M. Vinodkumar; Akhil Jhingan; P. Sugathan; J. J. Das; R. Singh

doi:10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802

Reply to ‘Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” ’

S. K. Hui, A. K. Sinha, M. Thoennessen, G. Gervais, A. K. Ganguly, N. Madhavan, S. Murlithar, D. O. Kataria, C. R. Bhuinya, Lagy T. Baby, Vandana Tripathi, P. V. Madhusudhana Rao, N. V.S.V. Prasad, A. M. Vinodkumar, Akhil Jhingan, P. Sugathan, J. J. Das, R. Singh

Radiation Oncology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

We agree with the preceding Comment that the evaporation residue cross-section measurement is indeed a sensitive tool to study nuclear viscosity. The CASCADE calculations with the improved level-density description used by Diószegi reproduce our evaporation residue measurement without nuclear viscosity. However, our CASCADE calculations were not used to reproduce the absolute magnitude of the evaporation residue cross section but rather the shape of the spin distribution. The calculations show that the spin distribution can be fitted to the standard calculation without dissipation in agreement with the Comment by Diószegi. We conclude that the need to include nuclear viscosity effects in previous measurements must be due to strong viscosity outside of the saddle point.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	2
Number of pages	1
Journal	Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics
Volume	64
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802
State	Published - 2001

Publisher link

10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

Hui, S. K., Sinha, A. K., Thoennessen, M., Gervais, G., Ganguly, A. K., Madhavan, N., Murlithar, S., Kataria, D. O., Bhuinya, C. R., Baby, L. T., Tripathi, V., Madhusudhana Rao, P. V., Prasad, N. V. S. V., Vinodkumar, A. M., Jhingan, A., Sugathan, P., Das, J. J., & Singh, R. (2001). Reply to ‘Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” ’. Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, 64(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802

Hui, SK, Sinha, AK, Thoennessen, M, Gervais, G, Ganguly, AK, Madhavan, N, Murlithar, S, Kataria, DO, Bhuinya, CR, Baby, LT, Tripathi, V, Madhusudhana Rao, PV, Prasad, NVSV, Vinodkumar, AM, Jhingan, A, Sugathan, P, Das, JJ & Singh, R 2001, 'Reply to ‘Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” ’', Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics, vol. 64, no. 1, pp. 2. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802

@article{b3cdc0aaf4ce4e14b5f9f4970ab516c4,

title = "Reply to {\textquoteleft}Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” {\textquoteright}",

abstract = "We agree with the preceding Comment that the evaporation residue cross-section measurement is indeed a sensitive tool to study nuclear viscosity. The CASCADE calculations with the improved level-density description used by Di{\'o}szegi reproduce our evaporation residue measurement without nuclear viscosity. However, our CASCADE calculations were not used to reproduce the absolute magnitude of the evaporation residue cross section but rather the shape of the spin distribution. The calculations show that the spin distribution can be fitted to the standard calculation without dissipation in agreement with the Comment by Di{\'o}szegi. We conclude that the need to include nuclear viscosity effects in previous measurements must be due to strong viscosity outside of the saddle point.",

author = "Hui, {S. K.} and Sinha, {A. K.} and M. Thoennessen and G. Gervais and Ganguly, {A. K.} and N. Madhavan and S. Murlithar and Kataria, {D. O.} and Bhuinya, {C. R.} and Baby, {Lagy T.} and Vandana Tripathi and {Madhusudhana Rao}, {P. V.} and Prasad, {N. V.S.V.} and Vinodkumar, {A. M.} and Akhil Jhingan and P. Sugathan and Das, {J. J.} and R. Singh",

year = "2001",

doi = "10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "64",

pages = "2",

journal = "Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics",

issn = "0556-2813",

publisher = "American Physical Society",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reply to ‘Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” ’

AU - Hui, S. K.

AU - Sinha, A. K.

AU - Thoennessen, M.

AU - Gervais, G.

AU - Ganguly, A. K.

AU - Madhavan, N.

AU - Murlithar, S.

AU - Kataria, D. O.

AU - Bhuinya, C. R.

AU - Baby, Lagy T.

AU - Tripathi, Vandana

AU - Madhusudhana Rao, P. V.

AU - Prasad, N. V.S.V.

AU - Vinodkumar, A. M.

AU - Jhingan, Akhil

AU - Sugathan, P.

AU - Das, J. J.

AU - Singh, R.

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - We agree with the preceding Comment that the evaporation residue cross-section measurement is indeed a sensitive tool to study nuclear viscosity. The CASCADE calculations with the improved level-density description used by Diószegi reproduce our evaporation residue measurement without nuclear viscosity. However, our CASCADE calculations were not used to reproduce the absolute magnitude of the evaporation residue cross section but rather the shape of the spin distribution. The calculations show that the spin distribution can be fitted to the standard calculation without dissipation in agreement with the Comment by Diószegi. We conclude that the need to include nuclear viscosity effects in previous measurements must be due to strong viscosity outside of the saddle point.

AB - We agree with the preceding Comment that the evaporation residue cross-section measurement is indeed a sensitive tool to study nuclear viscosity. The CASCADE calculations with the improved level-density description used by Diószegi reproduce our evaporation residue measurement without nuclear viscosity. However, our CASCADE calculations were not used to reproduce the absolute magnitude of the evaporation residue cross section but rather the shape of the spin distribution. The calculations show that the spin distribution can be fitted to the standard calculation without dissipation in agreement with the Comment by Diószegi. We conclude that the need to include nuclear viscosity effects in previous measurements must be due to strong viscosity outside of the saddle point.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85035275505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85035275505&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802

DO - 10.1103/PhysRevC.64.019802

M3 - Letter

AN - SCOPUS:85035275505

SN - 0556-2813

VL - 64

SP - 2

JO - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

JF - Physical Review C - Nuclear Physics

IS - 1

ER -

Reply to ‘Comment on “Spin and excitation energy dependence of fission survival for the [Formula Presented] system” ’

Abstract

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this