Skip to main navigation
Skip to search
Skip to main content
Experts@Minnesota Home
Search content at Experts@Minnesota
Home
Profiles
Research units
University Assets
Projects and Grants
Research output
Datasets
Press/Media
Activities
Fellowships, Honors, and Prizes
Impacts
Remarks on linear and nonlinear failure criteria
J. F. Labuz
, Pouyan Asem
, H. Fuselier
Civil, Environmental, and Geo- Engineering
Research output
:
Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding
›
Conference contribution
Overview
Fingerprint
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Remarks on linear and nonlinear failure criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
Sort by
Weight
Alphabetically
Keyphrases
Mohr-Coulomb
100%
Nonlinear Failure Criterion
100%
Friction Angle
66%
Taiwan
33%
Stress State
33%
Sandstone
33%
Uniaxial Compression
33%
Published Data
33%
Rock Type
33%
Strength Test
33%
Extension Strength
33%
Piecewise Linear
33%
Failure Surface
33%
First Principal Stress
33%
Minor Principal Stress
33%
Principal Stress
33%
Triaxial Extension
33%
Siltstone
33%
Better Approximation
33%
Red Wildmoor Sandstone
33%
Conventional Triaxial
33%
Hoek-Brown
33%
Linear Criterion
33%
Stress Invariants
33%
Nonlinear Criterion
33%
Multiaxial Strength
33%
Popular
33%
Engineering
Failure Criterion
100%
Friction Angle
100%
Axisymmetric
50%
Test Data
50%
Rock Type
50%
Failure Surface
50%
Minor Principal Stress
50%
Major Principal Stress
50%
Axisymmetric Compression
50%
Stress State
50%
Stress Invariant
50%
Siltstone
50%
Earth and Planetary Sciences
Sandstone
100%
Siltstone
50%
Taiwan
50%