Reliability assessment of actuator architectures for unmanned aircraft

Raghu Venkataraman, Peter J Seiler Jr, Márk Lukátsi, Bálint Vanek

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Governmental organizations are currently developing standards for civil unmannedaircraft to operate safely in the national airspace. A key requirement for aircraft certification is reliability assessment. Traditional reliability assessment methods make assumptions that are overly restrictive when applied to unmanned aircraft. This paper presents a step-by-step, model-based, reliability assessment method that is tailored for unmanned aircraft. In particular, this paper investigates the effects of stuck actuator faults (a common failure mode in electromechanical actuators) on the overall reliability. Several candidate actuator architectures, with different numbers of controllable surfaces, are compared to gain insight into the effect of actuator placement on reliability. It is assumed that a fault detection algorithm is available and affected by known rates of false alarms and missed detections. The overall reliability is shown to be dependent on several parameters, including hardware quality, fault detection performance, mission profile, flight envelope, and operating point. In addition to being an analysis tool, the method can help understand aircraft design tradeoffs.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)955-966
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Aircraft
Volume54
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Actuators
Aircraft
Fault detection
Electromechanical actuators
Flight envelopes
Failure modes
Hardware

Cite this

Reliability assessment of actuator architectures for unmanned aircraft. / Venkataraman, Raghu; Seiler Jr, Peter J; Lukátsi, Márk; Vanek, Bálint.

In: Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 54, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 955-966.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Venkataraman, Raghu ; Seiler Jr, Peter J ; Lukátsi, Márk ; Vanek, Bálint. / Reliability assessment of actuator architectures for unmanned aircraft. In: Journal of Aircraft. 2017 ; Vol. 54, No. 3. pp. 955-966.
@article{198144a036024396adef793c8e9cb48e,
title = "Reliability assessment of actuator architectures for unmanned aircraft",
abstract = "Governmental organizations are currently developing standards for civil unmannedaircraft to operate safely in the national airspace. A key requirement for aircraft certification is reliability assessment. Traditional reliability assessment methods make assumptions that are overly restrictive when applied to unmanned aircraft. This paper presents a step-by-step, model-based, reliability assessment method that is tailored for unmanned aircraft. In particular, this paper investigates the effects of stuck actuator faults (a common failure mode in electromechanical actuators) on the overall reliability. Several candidate actuator architectures, with different numbers of controllable surfaces, are compared to gain insight into the effect of actuator placement on reliability. It is assumed that a fault detection algorithm is available and affected by known rates of false alarms and missed detections. The overall reliability is shown to be dependent on several parameters, including hardware quality, fault detection performance, mission profile, flight envelope, and operating point. In addition to being an analysis tool, the method can help understand aircraft design tradeoffs.",
author = "Raghu Venkataraman and {Seiler Jr}, {Peter J} and M{\'a}rk Luk{\'a}tsi and B{\'a}lint Vanek",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2514/1.C033832",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "54",
pages = "955--966",
journal = "Journal of Aircraft",
issn = "0021-8669",
publisher = "American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics Inc. (AIAA)",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reliability assessment of actuator architectures for unmanned aircraft

AU - Venkataraman, Raghu

AU - Seiler Jr, Peter J

AU - Lukátsi, Márk

AU - Vanek, Bálint

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - Governmental organizations are currently developing standards for civil unmannedaircraft to operate safely in the national airspace. A key requirement for aircraft certification is reliability assessment. Traditional reliability assessment methods make assumptions that are overly restrictive when applied to unmanned aircraft. This paper presents a step-by-step, model-based, reliability assessment method that is tailored for unmanned aircraft. In particular, this paper investigates the effects of stuck actuator faults (a common failure mode in electromechanical actuators) on the overall reliability. Several candidate actuator architectures, with different numbers of controllable surfaces, are compared to gain insight into the effect of actuator placement on reliability. It is assumed that a fault detection algorithm is available and affected by known rates of false alarms and missed detections. The overall reliability is shown to be dependent on several parameters, including hardware quality, fault detection performance, mission profile, flight envelope, and operating point. In addition to being an analysis tool, the method can help understand aircraft design tradeoffs.

AB - Governmental organizations are currently developing standards for civil unmannedaircraft to operate safely in the national airspace. A key requirement for aircraft certification is reliability assessment. Traditional reliability assessment methods make assumptions that are overly restrictive when applied to unmanned aircraft. This paper presents a step-by-step, model-based, reliability assessment method that is tailored for unmanned aircraft. In particular, this paper investigates the effects of stuck actuator faults (a common failure mode in electromechanical actuators) on the overall reliability. Several candidate actuator architectures, with different numbers of controllable surfaces, are compared to gain insight into the effect of actuator placement on reliability. It is assumed that a fault detection algorithm is available and affected by known rates of false alarms and missed detections. The overall reliability is shown to be dependent on several parameters, including hardware quality, fault detection performance, mission profile, flight envelope, and operating point. In addition to being an analysis tool, the method can help understand aircraft design tradeoffs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85019770563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85019770563&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2514/1.C033832

DO - 10.2514/1.C033832

M3 - Article

VL - 54

SP - 955

EP - 966

JO - Journal of Aircraft

JF - Journal of Aircraft

SN - 0021-8669

IS - 3

ER -