Reliability and validity of parental measurements of infant size

Jenni L. Bradley, Judith E. Brown, John H. Himes

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study evaluates the reliability and validity of parental measurements of infant size, using illustrated instructions and simple measuring tools. Following pilot tests, final methods were evaluated on a sample of 28 parents (26 mothers and 2 fathers) of infants from 1 to 6 weeks of age. Parents independently measured twice the infant's head circumference (HC), mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), abdominal circumference (AC), and recumbent length (RL). Infants were also measured twice by a trained observer. Mean parental measures were correlated (intraclass R) with the observer criterion measures at the levels of 0.81 for RL, 0.70 for AC, 0.80 for MUAC, and 0.94 for HC. Relative differences in the means for measurements obtained by parents and the trained observer were small, ranging from 0.3% for HC and RL, to 3.8% for AC. Intraclass correlations of reliability between the two parental measurements ranged from R = 0.84 for MUAC to 0.96 for RL. Given the reliability and validity of the results, the methods tested yield measurements that are suitable for ranking individuals and for use in group-level analyses, and at least in the case of head circumference, for individual-level analyses.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)275-279
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Human Biology
Volume13
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2 2001

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Reliability and validity of parental measurements of infant size'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this