Relationships between environmental variables and benthic diatom assemblages in California Central Valley streams (USA)

Yangdong Pan, Brian H. Hill, Peter Husby, Robert K. Hall, Philip R. Kaufmann

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

23 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study examines distributional patterns of benthic diatom assemblages in relation to environmental characteristics in streams and rivers in the California Central Valley ecoregion. Benthic diatoms, water quality, and physical habitat conditions were characterized from 53 randomly selected sites. The stream sites were characterized by low mid-channel canopy cover and high channel substrate embeddedness. The waters at these sites were enriched with minerals and turbidity varied from 1.3 to 185.0 NTU with an average of 13.5 NTU. A total of 249 diatom taxa were identified. Average taxa richness was 41 with a range of 7-76. The assemblages were dominated by Staurosira construens (11%), Epithemia sorex (8%), Cocconeis placentula (7%), and Nitzschia amphibia (6%). Multivariate analyses (cluster analysis, classification tree analysis, and canonical correspondence analysis) all showed that benthic diatom assemblages were mainly affected by channel morphology, in-stream habitat, and riparian conditions. The 1st CCA axis negatively correlated with mean wetted channel width (r = -0.66) and thalweg depth (r = -0.65) (Table 4). The 2nd axis correlated with % coarse substrates (r=0.60). Our results suggest that benthic diatoms can be used for assessing physical habitat alterations in streams.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)119-130
Number of pages12
JournalHydrobiologia
Volume561
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2006

Keywords

  • Canonical correspondence analysis
  • Classification tree analysis
  • Cluster analysis
  • TWINSPAN
  • UPGMA

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Relationships between environmental variables and benthic diatom assemblages in California Central Valley streams (USA)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this