Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities

Huann shyang Lin, Frances Lawrenz, Shu Fen Lin, Zuway R. Hong

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Scopus citations

Abstract

This study investigated how affective factors impact participation in science learning using structural equation modeling. Using a dataset from Taiwan, a model was obtained that showed the relationships among science-related interest, enjoyment, self-efficacy, self-concept, competency, leisure time engagement, and future interest in science. The paths relating to engagement and future interest were much stronger for interest and enjoyment than for self-efficacy and self-concept. There was no significant path between science competency and future science interest or engagement. The results suggest that the affective and cognitive pathways to scientific competency are divergent and that they might be differentially activated by different contexts and activities. This indicates that school science educators might wish to reconsider the merit of overemphasizing achievement in comparison to interest. Finally, the results suggest that the development of science competency per se may not be the best way to ensure public engagement and understanding of science.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)941-954
Number of pages14
JournalPublic Understanding of Science
Volume22
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2013

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This study was supported by the National Science Council, Taiwan, under grants NSC 100-2918-I-110-009 and NSC 95-2522-S-110-001. The authors are thankful to the research assistants, students, and teachers who have been very supportive to this study.

Copyright:
Copyright 2013 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • public participation
  • public understanding of science
  • science attitudes and perceptions
  • science education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this