Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Relationship between coronavirus-related ehealth literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-based survey study

  • Lawrence An
  • , Elizabeth Bacon
  • , Sarah Hawley
  • , Penny Yang
  • , Daniel Russell
  • , Scott Huffman
  • , Ken Resnicow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: During a global pandemic, it is critical that the public is able to rapidly acquire new and accurate health information. The internet is a major source of health information. eHealth literacy is the ability of individuals to find, assess, and use health information available on the internet. Objective: The goals of this study were to assess coronavirus-related eHealth literacy and examine the relationship between eHealth literacy and COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs). Methods: We conducted a web-based survey of a representative sample of 1074 US adults. We adapted the 8-item eHealth Literacy Scale to develop the Coronavirus-Related eHealth Literacy Scale (CoV-eHEALS) to measure COVID-19-related knowledge, conspiracy beliefs, and adherence to protective behaviors (eg, wearing facial masks and social distancing). Our analyses identified sociodemographic associations with the participants' CoV-eHEALS scores and an association between the CoV-eHEALS measure and COVID-19 KAPs. Results: The internal consistency of the adapted CoV-eHEALS measure was high (Cronbach a=.92). The mean score for the CoV-eHEALS was 29.0 (SD 6.1). A total of 29% (306/1074) of the survey participants were classified as having low coronavirus-related eHealth literacy (CoV-eHEALS score <26). Independent associations were found between CoV-eHEALS scores and ethnicity (standardized β=-.083, P=.016 for Black participants) and education level (standardized β=-.151, P=.001 for participants with high-school education or lower). Controlling for demographic characteristics, CoV-eHEALS scores demonstrated positive independent associations with knowledge (standardized β=.168, P<.001) and adherence to protective behaviors (standardized β=.241, P<.001) and a negative association with conspiracy beliefs (standardized β=-.082, P=.009). Conclusions: This study provides an estimate of coronavirus-related eHealth literacy among US adults. Our findings suggest that a substantial proportion of US adults have low coronavirus-related eHealth literacy and are thus at a greater risk of lower and less-protective COVID-19 KAPs. These findings highlight the need to assess and address eHealth literacy as part of COVID-19 control efforts. Potential strategies include improving the quality of health information about COVID-19 available on the internet, assisting or simplifying web-based search for information about COVID-19, and training to improve general or coronavirus-specific search skills.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article numbere25042
JournalJournal of medical Internet research
Volume23
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2021
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 Journal of Medical Internet Research. All rights reserved.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Attitude
  • Behavior
  • COVID-19
  • Conspiracy beliefs
  • Coronavirus
  • Digital health
  • EHealth
  • EHealth literacy
  • Health communication
  • Internet
  • Knowledge
  • Protective behaviors
  • Social distancing
  • Survey

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Relationship between coronavirus-related ehealth literacy and COVID-19 Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices among US Adults: Web-based survey study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this