@inproceedings{c5dedd5cc5804d40a63f2267149d2b30,
title = "Reject me: Peer review and SIGCHI",
abstract = "The HCI research community grows bigger each year, refining and expanding its boundaries in new ways. The ability to effectively review submissions is critical to the growth of CHI and related conferences. The review process is designed to produce a consistent supply of fair, high-quality reviews without overloading individual reviewers; yet, after each cycle, concerns are raised about limitations of the process. Every year, participants are left wondering why their papers were not accepted (or why they were). This SIG will explore reviewing through a critical and constructive lens, discussing current successes and future opportunities in the CHI review process. Goals will include actionable conclusions about ways to improve the system, potential alternative peer models, and the creation of materials to educate newcomer reviewers.",
keywords = "design, methods, reflexivity, reviewing, systems",
author = "Michael Bernstein and Dan Cosley and Carl DiSalvo and Sanjay Kairam and David Karger and Travis Kriplean and Cliff Lampe and Wendy Mackay and Loren Terveen and Jacob Wobbrock and Sarita Yardi",
year = "2012",
doi = "10.1145/2212776.2212422",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9781450310161",
series = "Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - Proceedings",
pages = "1197--1200",
booktitle = "Extended Abstracts - The 30th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012",
note = "30th ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2012 ; Conference date: 05-05-2012 Through 10-05-2012",
}