Reflections on the Study of Infant Perception and Cognition

What Does Morgan's Canon Really Tell Us to Do?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

This commentary on Needham's (2001, this issue) work focuses on the types of evidence needed to make inferences concerning infant cognition. It is helpful to consider the history of the positions that have been held by scientists who have tried to explain the cognitive abilities of animals, deemed to be so very different from adult humans, and in that regard, similar to infants. The justification of inference is not a matter of personal taste or the application of a rigid doctrine. Rather, the study of infant cognition requires a high level of creativity in the creation and testing of alternative explanations. By understanding lessons from our past, current researchers should be better able to conduct their studies and draw appropriate conclusions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)50-54
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Experimental Child Psychology
Volume78
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2001

Fingerprint

Cognition
Aptitude
Creativity
History
Research Personnel

Keywords

  • Consciousness in animals and infants
  • History of research in cognition
  • Infancy
  • Infant cognitions
  • Infant perception
  • Morgan's canon
  • Research methods in infancy research

Cite this

@article{8ea22255501b4e629cab79c7665bd6e9,
title = "Reflections on the Study of Infant Perception and Cognition: What Does Morgan's Canon Really Tell Us to Do?",
abstract = "This commentary on Needham's (2001, this issue) work focuses on the types of evidence needed to make inferences concerning infant cognition. It is helpful to consider the history of the positions that have been held by scientists who have tried to explain the cognitive abilities of animals, deemed to be so very different from adult humans, and in that regard, similar to infants. The justification of inference is not a matter of personal taste or the application of a rigid doctrine. Rather, the study of infant cognition requires a high level of creativity in the creation and testing of alternative explanations. By understanding lessons from our past, current researchers should be better able to conduct their studies and draw appropriate conclusions.",
keywords = "Consciousness in animals and infants, History of research in cognition, Infancy, Infant cognitions, Infant perception, Morgan's canon, Research methods in infancy research",
author = "Albert Yonas",
year = "2001",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1006/jecp.2000.2605",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "78",
pages = "50--54",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Child Psychology",
issn = "0022-0965",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reflections on the Study of Infant Perception and Cognition

T2 - What Does Morgan's Canon Really Tell Us to Do?

AU - Yonas, Albert

PY - 2001/1/1

Y1 - 2001/1/1

N2 - This commentary on Needham's (2001, this issue) work focuses on the types of evidence needed to make inferences concerning infant cognition. It is helpful to consider the history of the positions that have been held by scientists who have tried to explain the cognitive abilities of animals, deemed to be so very different from adult humans, and in that regard, similar to infants. The justification of inference is not a matter of personal taste or the application of a rigid doctrine. Rather, the study of infant cognition requires a high level of creativity in the creation and testing of alternative explanations. By understanding lessons from our past, current researchers should be better able to conduct their studies and draw appropriate conclusions.

AB - This commentary on Needham's (2001, this issue) work focuses on the types of evidence needed to make inferences concerning infant cognition. It is helpful to consider the history of the positions that have been held by scientists who have tried to explain the cognitive abilities of animals, deemed to be so very different from adult humans, and in that regard, similar to infants. The justification of inference is not a matter of personal taste or the application of a rigid doctrine. Rather, the study of infant cognition requires a high level of creativity in the creation and testing of alternative explanations. By understanding lessons from our past, current researchers should be better able to conduct their studies and draw appropriate conclusions.

KW - Consciousness in animals and infants

KW - History of research in cognition

KW - Infancy

KW - Infant cognitions

KW - Infant perception

KW - Morgan's canon

KW - Research methods in infancy research

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0347710597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0347710597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1006/jecp.2000.2605

DO - 10.1006/jecp.2000.2605

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 50

EP - 54

JO - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

JF - Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

SN - 0022-0965

IS - 1

ER -