Abstract
Self-reference refers to clinician revelations about themselves. Theory and research on self-reference are limited by a lack of uniform conceptualizations. This paper discusses two types of self-reference, self-disclosure, and self-involving responses. Included are definitions of each type of self-reference; description of definitional inconsistencies in the literature; discussion of prevalence, functions, and the multidimensional nature of self-reference; and practice implications and research recommendations. The ideas presented herein are intended to prompt researchers, practitioners, and educators to carefully consider the nature, scope, and functions of self-reference, and in doing so, bring greater conceptual and operational clarity to their work.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 349-358 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Psychotherapy |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Dec 2011 |
Keywords
- Clinician self-reference
- Psychotherapy
- Self-disclosure
- Self-involving responses
- Supervision
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reflections on the meaning of clinician self-reference: Are we speaking the same language?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS