TY - JOUR
T1 - Reducing greenhouse gas emissions for climate stabilization
T2 - Framing regional options
AU - Olabisi, Laura Schmitt
AU - Reich, Peter B
AU - Johnson, Kris A.
AU - Kapuscinski, Anne R.
AU - Suh, Sangwon
AU - Wilson, Elizabeth J
PY - 2009/3/15
Y1 - 2009/3/15
N2 - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has stated that stabilizing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations will require reduction of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by as much as 80% by 2050. Subnational efforts to cut emissions will inform policy development nationally and globally. We projected GHG mitigation strategies for Minnesota, which has adopted a strategic goal of 80% emissions reduction by 2050. A portfolio of conservation strategies, including electricity conservation, increased vehicle fleet fuel efficiency, and reduced vehicle miles traveled, is likely the most cost-effective option for Minnesota and could reduce emissions by 18% below 2005 levels. An 80% GHG reduction would require complete decarbonization of the electricity and transportation sectors, combined with carbon capture and sequestration at power plants, or deep cuts in other relatively more intransigent GHG-emitting sectors. In order to achieve ambitious GHG reduction goals, policymakers should promote aggressive conservation efforts, which would probably have negative net costs, while phasing in alternative fuels to replace coal and motor gasoline over the long-term.
AB - The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has stated that stabilizing atmospheric CO 2 concentrations will require reduction of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions by as much as 80% by 2050. Subnational efforts to cut emissions will inform policy development nationally and globally. We projected GHG mitigation strategies for Minnesota, which has adopted a strategic goal of 80% emissions reduction by 2050. A portfolio of conservation strategies, including electricity conservation, increased vehicle fleet fuel efficiency, and reduced vehicle miles traveled, is likely the most cost-effective option for Minnesota and could reduce emissions by 18% below 2005 levels. An 80% GHG reduction would require complete decarbonization of the electricity and transportation sectors, combined with carbon capture and sequestration at power plants, or deep cuts in other relatively more intransigent GHG-emitting sectors. In order to achieve ambitious GHG reduction goals, policymakers should promote aggressive conservation efforts, which would probably have negative net costs, while phasing in alternative fuels to replace coal and motor gasoline over the long-term.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=64549099302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=64549099302&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/es801171a
DO - 10.1021/es801171a
M3 - Article
C2 - 19368159
AN - SCOPUS:64549099302
SN - 0013-936X
VL - 43
SP - 1696
EP - 1703
JO - Environmental Science and Technology
JF - Environmental Science and Technology
IS - 6
ER -