Abstract
Winter cover crops might reduce nutrient loss to leaching in the Upper Midwest. New oilseed-bearing cash cover crops, such as winter camelina (Camelina sativa L.) and pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.), may provide needed incentives. However, the abilities of these crops to sequester labile soil nutrients are unknown. To address this unknown, N in shoot biomass, plant-available N and P in soil, and NO3--N and soluble reactive P in soil water collected from lysimeters placed at 30, 60, and 100 cm were measured in cover crop and fallow treatments established in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble and followed through a cover crop-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. Five no-till cover treatments (forage radish [Raphanus sativus L.], winter rye [Secale cereale L.], field pennycress, and winter camelina) were compared with two fallow treatments (chisel till and no-till). Pennycress and winter camelina were harvested at maturity after relay sowing of soybean. Winter rye and radish sequestered more N in autumn shoot biomass, ranging from 26 to 38 kg N ha-1, but overwintering oilseeds matched or exceeded N uptake in spring, ranging 28 to 49 kg N ha-1 before soybean planting. Nitrogen uptake was reflected by reductions in soil water NO3--N during cover crop and intercropping phases for all cover treatments (mean = 4 mg L-1), compared with fallow treatments (mean = 31 mg L-1). Cash cover crops like pennycress and winter camelina provide both environmental and potential economic resources to growers. They are cash-generating crops able to sequester labile soil nutrients, which protects and promotes soil health from autumn through early summer.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 660-669 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Journal of Environmental Quality |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 1 2019 |
Fingerprint
PubMed: MeSH publication types
- Journal Article
Cite this
Reduced potential for nitrogen loss in cover crop-soybean relay systems in a cold climate. / Weyers, Sharon; Thom, Matt; Forcella, Frank; Eberle, Carrie; Matthees, Heather; Gesch, Russ; Ott, Matthew; Feyereisen, Gary; Strock, Jeffery; Wyse, Don.
In: Journal of Environmental Quality, Vol. 48, No. 3, 01.05.2019, p. 660-669.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - Reduced potential for nitrogen loss in cover crop-soybean relay systems in a cold climate
AU - Weyers, Sharon
AU - Thom, Matt
AU - Forcella, Frank
AU - Eberle, Carrie
AU - Matthees, Heather
AU - Gesch, Russ
AU - Ott, Matthew
AU - Feyereisen, Gary
AU - Strock, Jeffery
AU - Wyse, Don
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Winter cover crops might reduce nutrient loss to leaching in the Upper Midwest. New oilseed-bearing cash cover crops, such as winter camelina (Camelina sativa L.) and pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.), may provide needed incentives. However, the abilities of these crops to sequester labile soil nutrients are unknown. To address this unknown, N in shoot biomass, plant-available N and P in soil, and NO3--N and soluble reactive P in soil water collected from lysimeters placed at 30, 60, and 100 cm were measured in cover crop and fallow treatments established in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble and followed through a cover crop-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. Five no-till cover treatments (forage radish [Raphanus sativus L.], winter rye [Secale cereale L.], field pennycress, and winter camelina) were compared with two fallow treatments (chisel till and no-till). Pennycress and winter camelina were harvested at maturity after relay sowing of soybean. Winter rye and radish sequestered more N in autumn shoot biomass, ranging from 26 to 38 kg N ha-1, but overwintering oilseeds matched or exceeded N uptake in spring, ranging 28 to 49 kg N ha-1 before soybean planting. Nitrogen uptake was reflected by reductions in soil water NO3--N during cover crop and intercropping phases for all cover treatments (mean = 4 mg L-1), compared with fallow treatments (mean = 31 mg L-1). Cash cover crops like pennycress and winter camelina provide both environmental and potential economic resources to growers. They are cash-generating crops able to sequester labile soil nutrients, which protects and promotes soil health from autumn through early summer.
AB - Winter cover crops might reduce nutrient loss to leaching in the Upper Midwest. New oilseed-bearing cash cover crops, such as winter camelina (Camelina sativa L.) and pennycress (Thlaspi arvense L.), may provide needed incentives. However, the abilities of these crops to sequester labile soil nutrients are unknown. To address this unknown, N in shoot biomass, plant-available N and P in soil, and NO3--N and soluble reactive P in soil water collected from lysimeters placed at 30, 60, and 100 cm were measured in cover crop and fallow treatments established in spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) stubble and followed through a cover crop-soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] rotation. Five no-till cover treatments (forage radish [Raphanus sativus L.], winter rye [Secale cereale L.], field pennycress, and winter camelina) were compared with two fallow treatments (chisel till and no-till). Pennycress and winter camelina were harvested at maturity after relay sowing of soybean. Winter rye and radish sequestered more N in autumn shoot biomass, ranging from 26 to 38 kg N ha-1, but overwintering oilseeds matched or exceeded N uptake in spring, ranging 28 to 49 kg N ha-1 before soybean planting. Nitrogen uptake was reflected by reductions in soil water NO3--N during cover crop and intercropping phases for all cover treatments (mean = 4 mg L-1), compared with fallow treatments (mean = 31 mg L-1). Cash cover crops like pennycress and winter camelina provide both environmental and potential economic resources to growers. They are cash-generating crops able to sequester labile soil nutrients, which protects and promotes soil health from autumn through early summer.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066933674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85066933674&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.2134/jeq2018.09.0350
DO - 10.2134/jeq2018.09.0350
M3 - Article
C2 - 31180428
AN - SCOPUS:85066933674
VL - 48
SP - 660
EP - 669
JO - Journal of Environmental Quality
JF - Journal of Environmental Quality
SN - 0047-2425
IS - 3
ER -