Reduced-intensity transplantation for lymphomas using haploidentical related donors versus HLA-matched sibling donors: A center for international blood and marrow transplant research analysis

  • Nilanjan Ghosh
  • , Reem Karmali
  • , Vanderson Rocha
  • , Kwang Woo Ahn
  • , Alyssa DiGilio
  • , Parameswaran N. Hari
  • , Veronika Bachanova
  • , Ulrike Bacher
  • , Parastoo Dahi
  • , Marcos De Lima
  • , Anita D'Souza
  • , Timothy S. Fenske
  • , Siddhartha Ganguly
  • , Mohamed A. Kharfan-Dabaja
  • , Tim D. Prestidge
  • , Bipin N. Savani
  • , Sonali M. Smith
  • , Anna M. Sureda
  • , Edmund K. Waller
  • , Samantha Jaglowski
  • Alex F. Herrera, Philippe Armand, Rachel B. Salit, Nina D. Wagner-Johnston, Ephraim Fuchs, Javier Bolaños-Meade, Mehdi Hamadani

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

205 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Related donor haploidentical hematopoietic cell transplantation (Haplo-HCT) using post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PT-Cy) is increasingly used in patients lacking HLA-matched sibling donors (MSD). We compared outcomes after Haplo-HCT using PT-Cy with MSD-HCT in patients with lymphoma, using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research registry. Materials and Methods: We evaluated 987 adult patients undergoing either Haplo-HCT (n = 180) or MSD-HCT (n = 807) following reduced-intensity conditioning regimens. The haploidentical group received graft-versushost disease (GVHD) prophylaxis with PT-Cy with or without a calcineurin inhibitor and mycophenolate. The MSD group received calcineurin inhibitor-based GVHD prophylaxis. Results: Median follow-up of survivors was 3 years. The 28-day neutrophil recovery was similar in the two groups (95% v 97%; P = .31). The 28-day platelet recovery was delayed in the haploidentical group compared with the MSD group (63% v 91%; P = .001). Cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD at day 100 was similar between the two groups (27% v 25%; P = .84). Cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD at 1 year was significantly lower after Haplo-HCT (12% v 45%; P < .001), and this benefit was confirmed on multivariate analysis (relative risk, 0.21; 95% CI, 0.14 to 0.31; P < .001). For Haplo-HCT v MSD-HCT, 3-year rates of nonrelapse mortality (15% v 13%; P = .41), relapse/progression (37% v 40%; P = .51), progression-free survival (48% v 48%; P = .96), and overall survival (61% v 62%; P = .82) were similar. Multivariate analysis showed no significant difference between Haplo-HCT and MSD-HCT in terms of nonrelapse mortality (P = .06), progression/relapse (P = .10), progression-free survival (P = .83), and overall survival (P = .34). Conclusion: Haplo-HCT with PT-Cy provides survival outcomes comparable to MSD-HCT, with a significantly lower risk of chronic GVHD.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3141-3149
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume34
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 10 2016

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Reduced-intensity transplantation for lymphomas using haploidentical related donors versus HLA-matched sibling donors: A center for international blood and marrow transplant research analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this