Abstract
A key question in strategy is whether comprehensiveness enables firms to make better strategic decisions in various environments. I identify two problems hindering efforts to answer this question: past studies have generally theorized about a different dependent variable than they have measured, and they have conflated the concepts of uncertainty, ambiguity, and instability in accounting for environmental moderation. I then reframe the question and propose ways of characterizing organizational information environments so researchers can identify more precisely those real-world contexts across which the value of comprehensiveness varies. Copyright of the Academy of Management, all rights reserved.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 361-376 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Academy of Management Review |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 2007 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Reconsidering the strategic implications of decision comprehensiveness'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS