Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

Adam J. Saffer; Aimei Yang; Maureen Taylor

doi:10.1177/0893318917700510

Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

Adam J. Saffer, Aimei Yang, Maureen Taylor

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

35 Scopus citations

Abstract

Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations’ institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.

Original language	English (US)
Pages (from-to)	121-139
Number of pages	19
Journal	Management Communication Quarterly
Volume	32
Issue number	1
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318917700510
State	Published - Feb 1 2018
Externally published	Yes

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: University of Oklahoma 10.13039/100007926 Robberson Research & Creative Endeavors Grant.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.

Keywords

ERGM
multistakeholder issue network
network analysis
stakeholder theory

Publisher link

10.1177/0893318917700510

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

@article{efb5927462594c72be28163a65326baa,

title = "Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management",

abstract = "Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations{\textquoteright} institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.",

keywords = "ERGM, multistakeholder issue network, network analysis, stakeholder theory",

author = "Saffer, {Adam J.} and Aimei Yang and Maureen Taylor",

note = "Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: University of Oklahoma 10.13039/100007926 Robberson Research & Creative Endeavors Grant. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2017, {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2017.",

year = "2018",

month = feb,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1177/0893318917700510",

language = "English (US)",

volume = "32",

pages = "121--139",

journal = "Management Communication Quarterly",

issn = "0893-3189",

publisher = "SAGE Publications Inc.",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

AU - Saffer, Adam J.

AU - Yang, Aimei

AU - Taylor, Maureen

N1 - Funding Information: The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: University of Oklahoma 10.13039/100007926 Robberson Research & Creative Endeavors Grant. Publisher Copyright: © 2017, © The Author(s) 2017.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations’ institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.

AB - Multistakeholder issue networks have been characterized as power-free, egalitarian forms of corporate–civil society engagement. Using a communication-centered conceptualization of power, our study finds that potential sources of power subtly manifest through communication and interaction patterns in multistakeholder issue networks. Our results indicate that organizations’ institutional status and resources are significant predictors of network power.

KW - ERGM

KW - multistakeholder issue network

KW - network analysis

KW - stakeholder theory

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85040092233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85040092233&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/0893318917700510

DO - 10.1177/0893318917700510

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85040092233

SN - 0893-3189

VL - 32

SP - 121

EP - 139

JO - Management Communication Quarterly

JF - Management Communication Quarterly

IS - 1

ER -

Reconsidering Power in Multistakeholder Relationship Management

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this