## Abstract

The relationship between Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity and Hendrik A. Lorentz's ether theory is best understood in terms of competing interpretations of Lorentz invariance. In the 1890s, Lorentz proved and exploited the Lorentz invariance of Maxwell's equations, the laws governing electromagnetic fields in the ether, with what he called the theorem of corresponding states. To account for the negative results of attempts to detect the earth's motion through the ether, Lorentz, in effect, had to assume that the laws governing the matter interacting with the fields are Lorentz invariant as well. This additional assumption can be seen as a generalization of the well-known contraction hypothesis. In Lorentz's theory, it remained an unexplained coincidence that both the laws governing fields and the laws governing matter should be Lorentz invariant. In special relativity, by contrast, the Lorentz invariance of all physical laws directly reflects the Minkowski space-time structure posited by the theory. One can use this observation to produce a common-cause argument to show that the relativistic interpretation of Lorentz invariance is preferable to Lorentz's interpretation.

Original language | English (US) |
---|---|

Pages (from-to) | 421-446 |

Number of pages | 26 |

Journal | Physics in Perspective |

Volume | 4 |

Issue number | 4 |

DOIs | |

State | Published - 2002 |

## Keywords

- Ad hoc hypothesis
- Albert Einstein
- Common-cause argument
- Contraction hypothesis
- Empirical equivalence
- Ether theory
- Hendrik A. Lorentz
- Lorentz invariance
- Special relativity
- Theorem of corresponding states
- Trouton-Noble experiment