TY - JOUR
T1 - Recommendations for reporting ion mobility Mass Spectrometry measurements
AU - Gabelica, Valérie
AU - Shvartsburg, Alexandre A.
AU - Afonso, Carlos
AU - Barran, Perdita
AU - Benesch, Justin L.P.
AU - Bleiholder, Christian
AU - Bowers, Michael T.
AU - Bilbao, Aivett
AU - Bush, Matthew F.
AU - Campbell, J. Larry
AU - Campuzano, Iain D.G.
AU - Causon, Tim
AU - Clowers, Brian H.
AU - Creaser, Colin S.
AU - De Pauw, Edwin
AU - Far, Johann
AU - Fernandez-Lima, Francisco
AU - Fjeldsted, John C.
AU - Giles, Kevin
AU - Groessl, Michael
AU - Hogan, Christopher J.
AU - Hann, Stephan
AU - Kim, Hugh I.
AU - Kurulugama, Ruwan T.
AU - May, Jody C.
AU - McLean, John A.
AU - Pagel, Kevin
AU - Richardson, Keith
AU - Ridgeway, Mark E.
AU - Rosu, Frédéric
AU - Sobott, Frank
AU - Thalassinos, Konstantinos
AU - Valentine, Stephen J.
AU - Wyttenbach, Thomas
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Authors. Mass Spectrometry Reviews Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
PY - 2019/5/1
Y1 - 2019/5/1
N2 - Here we present a guide to ion mobility mass spectrometry experiments, which covers both linear and nonlinear methods: what is measured, how the measurements are done, and how to report the results, including the uncertainties of mobility and collision cross section values. The guide aims to clarify some possibly confusing concepts, and the reporting recommendations should help researchers, authors and reviewers to contribute comprehensive reports, so that the ion mobility data can be reused more confidently. Starting from the concept of the definition of the measurand, we emphasize that (i) mobility values (K0) depend intrinsically on ion structure, the nature of the bath gas, temperature, and E/N; (ii) ion mobility does not measure molecular surfaces directly, but collision cross section (CCS) values are derived from mobility values using a physical model; (iii) methods relying on calibration are empirical (and thus may provide method-dependent results) only if the gas nature, temperature or E/N cannot match those of the primary method. Our analysis highlights the urgency of a community effort toward establishing primary standards and reference materials for ion mobility, and provides recommendations to do so.
AB - Here we present a guide to ion mobility mass spectrometry experiments, which covers both linear and nonlinear methods: what is measured, how the measurements are done, and how to report the results, including the uncertainties of mobility and collision cross section values. The guide aims to clarify some possibly confusing concepts, and the reporting recommendations should help researchers, authors and reviewers to contribute comprehensive reports, so that the ion mobility data can be reused more confidently. Starting from the concept of the definition of the measurand, we emphasize that (i) mobility values (K0) depend intrinsically on ion structure, the nature of the bath gas, temperature, and E/N; (ii) ion mobility does not measure molecular surfaces directly, but collision cross section (CCS) values are derived from mobility values using a physical model; (iii) methods relying on calibration are empirical (and thus may provide method-dependent results) only if the gas nature, temperature or E/N cannot match those of the primary method. Our analysis highlights the urgency of a community effort toward establishing primary standards and reference materials for ion mobility, and provides recommendations to do so.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060850796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85060850796&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/mas.21585
DO - 10.1002/mas.21585
M3 - Review article
C2 - 30707468
AN - SCOPUS:85060850796
SN - 0277-7037
VL - 38
SP - 291
EP - 320
JO - Mass Spectrometry Reviews
JF - Mass Spectrometry Reviews
IS - 3
ER -