Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Recent quitters' interest in recycling and harm reduction

  • Anne M Joseph
  • , Kathryn L Rice
  • , Lawrence C. An
  • , Asra Mohiuddin
  • , Harry A Lando

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Many smoking cessation attempts are followed by failure or relapse. The optimal time to initiate a new quit attempt is not known. Administrative databases documenting recent use of a pharmacological aid for smoking cessation provide access to a population of smokers recently in the action phase of quitting. This study describes interest in further treatment among this population. A total of 2,340 smokers from the Minneapolis Veterans Administration Medical Center received prescriptions for a smoking cessation aid during an 18-month period. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of a random sample of this population a minimum of 3 months following the prescription, using a structured telephone interview (N=391). The response rate was 75.8%. The 1-month point-prevalent abstinence rate was 19.7%. Of continuing smokers, 98% were willing to make another quit attempt - 50% immediately, and 28% within 1 month. There was no relationship between time since the last quit attempt and interest in trying again immediately. Some 95% of continuing smokers were willing to try a reduction strategy. Of these, 82.7% were interested in using nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) to accomplish this goal. Most cessation programs do not systematically approach participants who relapse. These data suggest that this population would welcome further help in quitting or reducing smoking shortly following failure, and that smokers do not commonly relapse to a precontemplation stage of change.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1075-1077
Number of pages3
JournalNicotine and Tobacco Research
Volume6
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recent quitters' interest in recycling and harm reduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this