Abstract
In IMRT/VMAT system commissioning (as with any system), quality is improved by striving for tight tolerances of stringent metrics of accuracy. For 5 cases, passing rates for 3%/3mm gamma analysis were generated following the TG119 instructions. Subsequently, more stringent/sensitive criteria combined with advanced volumetric dose analysis were applied, and in each case significant systematic errors were clearly identified despite the high 3%/3mm passing rates. In 4 of 5 cases, the error was easily remedied. These real-world examples of observed "false negatives" (insensitivities) point towards the inappropriateness of the 3%/3mm gamma passing rate metric as the basis for acceptance testing/commissioning of the IMRT/VMAT delivery chain.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Article number | 012086 |
| Pages (from-to) | 012086 |
| Journal | Journal of Physics: Conference Series |
| Volume | 444 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2013 |
| Event | 7th International Conference on 3D Radiation Dosimetry, IC3DDose 2012 - Sydney, NSW, Australia Duration: Dec 4 2012 → Dec 8 2012 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Real-world examples of sensitivity failures of the 3%/3mm pass rate metric and published action levels when used in IMRT/VMAT system commissioning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS