Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection?

Piet C. De Groen; Michael Szewczynski; Felicity Enders; Wallapak Tavanapong; Jung Hwan Oh; Johnny Wong

doi:10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection?

Piet C. De Groen, Michael Szewczynski, Felicity Enders, Wallapak Tavanapong, Jung Hwan Oh, Johnny Wong

Medicine - Gastro, Hepatology, Nutrition Division

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US despite wide use of colonoscopy to prevent CRC-related death. The current explanation for the failure of colonoscopy to prevent most CRC-related death is that lesions are not detected or completely removed. Real-time feedback during colonoscopy has the potential to alert endoscopists that sub-optimal visualization of the colon mucosa is occurring. To determine what type and frequency of feedback most likely will improve colonoscopy, we studied a set of randomly obtained video files for four features associated with quality of visualization: clear or blurry frames, camera speed, amount of remaining debris and effort of the endoscopist to inspect in a circumferential fashion all of the mucosa. Our results show that the two types of feedback most frequently needed to improve visualization are reminders to obtain clear frames or to inspect all of the mucosa in circumferential fashion.

Original language	English (US)
Title of host publication	Smart Education and Smart e-Learning
Editors	Robert J. Howlett, Vladimir L. Uskov, Lakhmi C. Jain
Publisher	Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
Pages	501-512
Number of pages	12
ISBN (Print)	9783319198743
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45
State	Published - 2015
Event	2nd International KES Conference on Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, SEEL 2015 - Sorrento, Italy Duration: Jun 17 2015 → Jun 19 2015

Publication series

Name	Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies
Volume	41
ISSN (Print)	2190-3018
ISSN (Electronic)	2190-3026

Other

Other	2nd International KES Conference on Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, SEEL 2015
Country/Territory	Italy
City	Sorrento
Period	6/17/15 → 6/19/15

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

Keywords

Colonoscopy
Colorectal cancer
Education
Quality features
Real-time feedback
Video stream analysis

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Publisher link

10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

Find It

Find It at U of M Libraries

Cite this

De Groen, P. C., Szewczynski, M., Enders, F., Tavanapong, W., Oh, J. H., & Wong, J. (2015). Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection? In R. J. Howlett, V. L. Uskov, & L. C. Jain (Eds.), Smart Education and Smart e-Learning (pp. 501-512). (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Vol. 41). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection? / De Groen, Piet C.; Szewczynski, Michael; Enders, Felicity et al.
Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. ed. / Robert J. Howlett; Vladimir L. Uskov; Lakhmi C. Jain. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2015. p. 501-512 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies; Vol. 41).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution

De Groen, PC, Szewczynski, M, Enders, F, Tavanapong, W, Oh, JH & Wong, J 2015, Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection? in RJ Howlett, VL Uskov & LC Jain (eds), Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies, vol. 41, Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, pp. 501-512, 2nd International KES Conference on Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, SEEL 2015, Sorrento, Italy, 6/17/15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

De Groen PC, Szewczynski M, Enders F, Tavanapong W, Oh JH, Wong J. Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection? In Howlett RJ, Uskov VL, Jain LC, editors, Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. 2015. p. 501-512. (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

De Groen, Piet C. ; Szewczynski, Michael ; Enders, Felicity et al. / Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality : How often to improve inspection?. Smart Education and Smart e-Learning. editor / Robert J. Howlett ; Vladimir L. Uskov ; Lakhmi C. Jain. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2015. pp. 501-512 (Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies).

@inproceedings{3709654d314c48d2bd75f464726f78e2,

title = "Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection?",

abstract = "Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US despite wide use of colonoscopy to prevent CRC-related death. The current explanation for the failure of colonoscopy to prevent most CRC-related death is that lesions are not detected or completely removed. Real-time feedback during colonoscopy has the potential to alert endoscopists that sub-optimal visualization of the colon mucosa is occurring. To determine what type and frequency of feedback most likely will improve colonoscopy, we studied a set of randomly obtained video files for four features associated with quality of visualization: clear or blurry frames, camera speed, amount of remaining debris and effort of the endoscopist to inspect in a circumferential fashion all of the mucosa. Our results show that the two types of feedback most frequently needed to improve visualization are reminders to obtain clear frames or to inspect all of the mucosa in circumferential fashion.",

keywords = "Colonoscopy, Colorectal cancer, Education, Quality features, Real-time feedback, Video stream analysis",

author = "{De Groen}, {Piet C.} and Michael Szewczynski and Felicity Enders and Wallapak Tavanapong and Oh, {Jung Hwan} and Johnny Wong",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.; 2nd International KES Conference on Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, SEEL 2015 ; Conference date: 17-06-2015 Through 19-06-2015",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45",

language = "English (US)",

isbn = "9783319198743",

series = "Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies",

publisher = "Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH",

pages = "501--512",

editor = "Howlett, {Robert J.} and Uskov, {Vladimir L.} and Jain, {Lakhmi C.}",

booktitle = "Smart Education and Smart e-Learning",

address = "Germany",

}

TY - GEN

T1 - Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality

T2 - 2nd International KES Conference on Smart Education and Smart e-Learning, SEEL 2015

AU - De Groen, Piet C.

AU - Szewczynski, Michael

AU - Enders, Felicity

AU - Tavanapong, Wallapak

AU - Oh, Jung Hwan

AU - Wong, Johnny

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2015.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US despite wide use of colonoscopy to prevent CRC-related death. The current explanation for the failure of colonoscopy to prevent most CRC-related death is that lesions are not detected or completely removed. Real-time feedback during colonoscopy has the potential to alert endoscopists that sub-optimal visualization of the colon mucosa is occurring. To determine what type and frequency of feedback most likely will improve colonoscopy, we studied a set of randomly obtained video files for four features associated with quality of visualization: clear or blurry frames, camera speed, amount of remaining debris and effort of the endoscopist to inspect in a circumferential fashion all of the mucosa. Our results show that the two types of feedback most frequently needed to improve visualization are reminders to obtain clear frames or to inspect all of the mucosa in circumferential fashion.

AB - Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer deaths in the US despite wide use of colonoscopy to prevent CRC-related death. The current explanation for the failure of colonoscopy to prevent most CRC-related death is that lesions are not detected or completely removed. Real-time feedback during colonoscopy has the potential to alert endoscopists that sub-optimal visualization of the colon mucosa is occurring. To determine what type and frequency of feedback most likely will improve colonoscopy, we studied a set of randomly obtained video files for four features associated with quality of visualization: clear or blurry frames, camera speed, amount of remaining debris and effort of the endoscopist to inspect in a circumferential fashion all of the mucosa. Our results show that the two types of feedback most frequently needed to improve visualization are reminders to obtain clear frames or to inspect all of the mucosa in circumferential fashion.

KW - Colonoscopy

KW - Colorectal cancer

KW - Education

KW - Quality features

KW - Real-time feedback

KW - Video stream analysis

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84947935724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84947935724&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-19875-0_45

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84947935724

SN - 9783319198743

T3 - Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies

SP - 501

EP - 512

BT - Smart Education and Smart e-Learning

A2 - Howlett, Robert J.

A2 - Uskov, Vladimir L.

A2 - Jain, Lakhmi C.

PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH

Y2 - 17 June 2015 through 19 June 2015

ER -

Real-time feedback during colonoscopy to improve quality: How often to improve inspection?

Abstract

Publication series

Other

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Publisher link

Find It

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this