Abstract
Faculty members from medicine, nursing, social work, and law, as well as a group of medical students, tested their own criteria for a good lecturer; each group focused on different aspects of the behaviors sought in the good lecture. The "Dr. Fox" paradigm was the lecture chosen; all groups failed to identify the deliberately incorporated failings. These results were then compared with the results obtained by using a standardized rating form in current use within a major university.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 278-286 |
| Number of pages | 9 |
| Journal | Journal of Community Health |
| Volume | 2 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jun 1 1977 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Rating the lecturer - A study of how different disciplines used comparative criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS