Rating the lecturer - A study of how different disciplines used comparative criteria

Robert L. Kane, Mitchell Schorow

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Faculty members from medicine, nursing, social work, and law, as well as a group of medical students, tested their own criteria for a good lecturer; each group focused on different aspects of the behaviors sought in the good lecture. The "Dr. Fox" paradigm was the lecture chosen; all groups failed to identify the deliberately incorporated failings. These results were then compared with the results obtained by using a standardized rating form in current use within a major university.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)278-286
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Community Health
Volume2
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 1977

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Rating the lecturer - A study of how different disciplines used comparative criteria'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this