Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect

M. Hassan Murad, Reem A. Mustafa, Holger J. Schünemann, Shahnaz Sultan, Nancy Santesso

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)85-87
Number of pages3
JournalEvidence-Based Medicine
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2017

Fingerprint

Meta-Analysis

Keywords

  • Epidemiology
  • Statistics and Research methods

Cite this

Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. / Murad, M. Hassan; Mustafa, Reem A.; Schünemann, Holger J.; Sultan, Shahnaz; Santesso, Nancy.

In: Evidence-Based Medicine, Vol. 22, No. 3, 01.06.2017, p. 85-87.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Murad, M. Hassan ; Mustafa, Reem A. ; Schünemann, Holger J. ; Sultan, Shahnaz ; Santesso, Nancy. / Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect. In: Evidence-Based Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 22, No. 3. pp. 85-87.
@article{f25e0f672f1040c0902f79dbd5b5deeb,
title = "Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect",
abstract = "When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.",
keywords = "Epidemiology, Statistics and Research methods",
author = "Murad, {M. Hassan} and Mustafa, {Reem A.} and Sch{\"u}nemann, {Holger J.} and Shahnaz Sultan and Nancy Santesso",
year = "2017",
month = "6",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "22",
pages = "85--87",
journal = "Evidence-Based Medicine",
issn = "1356-5524",
publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Rating the certainty in evidence in the absence of a single estimate of effect

AU - Murad, M. Hassan

AU - Mustafa, Reem A.

AU - Schünemann, Holger J.

AU - Sultan, Shahnaz

AU - Santesso, Nancy

PY - 2017/6/1

Y1 - 2017/6/1

N2 - When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.

AB - When studies measure or report outcomes differently, it may not be feasible to pool data across studies to generate a single effect estimate (ie, perform meta-analysis). Instead, only a narrative summary of the effect across different studies might be available. Regardless of whether a single pooled effect estimate is generated or whether data are summarised narratively, decision makers need to know the certainty in the evidence in order to make informed decisions. In this guide, we illustrate how to apply the constructs of the GRADE (Grading of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty in evidence when a meta-analysis has not been performed and data were summarised narratively.

KW - Epidemiology

KW - Statistics and Research methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020660158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85020660158&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668

DO - 10.1136/ebmed-2017-110668

M3 - Article

VL - 22

SP - 85

EP - 87

JO - Evidence-Based Medicine

JF - Evidence-Based Medicine

SN - 1356-5524

IS - 3

ER -