Ratification, reporting, and rights: Quality of participation in the convention against torture

Cosette D. Creamer, Beth A. Simmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

The core international human rights treaty bodies play an important role in monitoring implementation of human rights standards through consideration of states parties’ reports. Yet very little research explores how seriously governments take their reporting obligations. This article examines the reporting record of parties to the Convention against Torture, finding that report submission is heavily conditioned by the practices of neighboring countries and by a government’s human rights commitment and institutional capacity. This article also introduces original data on the quality and responsiveness of reports, finding that more democratic—and particularly newly democratic—governments tend to render higher quality reports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)579-608
Number of pages30
JournalHuman Rights Quarterly
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Ratification, reporting, and rights: Quality of participation in the convention against torture'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this