Ratification, reporting, and rights: Quality of participation in the convention against torture

Cosette D. Creamer, Beth A. Simmons

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

13 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The core international human rights treaty bodies play an important role in monitoring implementation of human rights standards through consideration of states parties’ reports. Yet very little research explores how seriously governments take their reporting obligations. This article examines the reporting record of parties to the Convention against Torture, finding that report submission is heavily conditioned by the practices of neighboring countries and by a government’s human rights commitment and institutional capacity. This article also introduces original data on the quality and responsiveness of reports, finding that more democratic—and particularly newly democratic—governments tend to render higher quality reports.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)579-608
Number of pages30
JournalHuman Rights Quarterly
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2015

Fingerprint

ratification
torture
human rights
participation
party state
neighboring countries
treaty
obligation
commitment
monitoring

Cite this

Ratification, reporting, and rights : Quality of participation in the convention against torture. / Creamer, Cosette D.; Simmons, Beth A.

In: Human Rights Quarterly, Vol. 37, No. 3, 01.08.2015, p. 579-608.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8dc186714ef64ab9a3f5c70f8edf553f,
title = "Ratification, reporting, and rights: Quality of participation in the convention against torture",
abstract = "The core international human rights treaty bodies play an important role in monitoring implementation of human rights standards through consideration of states parties’ reports. Yet very little research explores how seriously governments take their reporting obligations. This article examines the reporting record of parties to the Convention against Torture, finding that report submission is heavily conditioned by the practices of neighboring countries and by a government’s human rights commitment and institutional capacity. This article also introduces original data on the quality and responsiveness of reports, finding that more democratic—and particularly newly democratic—governments tend to render higher quality reports.",
author = "Creamer, {Cosette D.} and Simmons, {Beth A.}",
year = "2015",
month = "8",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/hrq.2015.0041",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "579--608",
journal = "Human Rights Quarterly",
issn = "0275-0392",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Ratification, reporting, and rights

T2 - Quality of participation in the convention against torture

AU - Creamer, Cosette D.

AU - Simmons, Beth A.

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - The core international human rights treaty bodies play an important role in monitoring implementation of human rights standards through consideration of states parties’ reports. Yet very little research explores how seriously governments take their reporting obligations. This article examines the reporting record of parties to the Convention against Torture, finding that report submission is heavily conditioned by the practices of neighboring countries and by a government’s human rights commitment and institutional capacity. This article also introduces original data on the quality and responsiveness of reports, finding that more democratic—and particularly newly democratic—governments tend to render higher quality reports.

AB - The core international human rights treaty bodies play an important role in monitoring implementation of human rights standards through consideration of states parties’ reports. Yet very little research explores how seriously governments take their reporting obligations. This article examines the reporting record of parties to the Convention against Torture, finding that report submission is heavily conditioned by the practices of neighboring countries and by a government’s human rights commitment and institutional capacity. This article also introduces original data on the quality and responsiveness of reports, finding that more democratic—and particularly newly democratic—governments tend to render higher quality reports.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84938880099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84938880099&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/hrq.2015.0041

DO - 10.1353/hrq.2015.0041

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84938880099

VL - 37

SP - 579

EP - 608

JO - Human Rights Quarterly

JF - Human Rights Quarterly

SN - 0275-0392

IS - 3

ER -