Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Rates of Subjective Failure After Both Isolated and Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry 2004-2021

  • Gilbert Moatshe
  • , Christopher M. LaPrade
  • , Anne Marie Fenstad
  • , Andreas Persson
  • , Matthew LaPrade
  • , R. Kyle Martin
  • , Lars Engebretsen
  • , Robert F. LaPrade

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: Outcomes after posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction (PCLR) have been reported to be inferior to those of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Furthermore, combined ligament injuries have been reported to have inferior outcomes compared with isolated PCLR. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to report on PCLR outcomes and failure rates and compare these outcomes between isolated PCLR and multiligament knee surgery involving the PCL. The hypothesis was that combined PCL injury reconstruction would have higher rates of subjective failure and revision relative to isolated PCLR. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients with primary PCLR with or without concomitant ligament injuries registered in the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry between 2004 and 2021 were included. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) totals were collected preoperatively and at 2 years and 5 years postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was failure, defined as either a revision surgery or a KOOS Quality of Life (QoL) subscale score <44. Results: The sample included 631 primary PCLR procedures, with 185 (29%) isolated PCLR procedures and 446 (71%) combined reconstructions, with a median follow-up time of 7.3 and 7.9 years, respectively. The majority of patients had poor preoperative knee function as defined by a KOOS QoL score <44 (90.1% isolated PCLR, 85.7% combined PCL injuries; P =.24). Subjective outcomes improved significantly at 2- and 5-year follow-up compared with preoperative assessments in both groups (P <.001); however, at 2 years, 49.5% and 46.5% had subjective failure (KOOS QoL <44) for isolated PCLR and combined PCLR, respectively (P =.61). At 5 years, the subjective failure rates of isolated and combined PCLR were 46.7% and 34.2%, respectively (P =.04). No significant difference was found in revision rates between the groups at 5 years (1.9% and 4.6%, respectively; P =.07). Conclusion: Patients who underwent PCLR had improved KOOS QoL scores relative to their preoperative state. However, the subjective failure rate was high for both isolated and multiligament PCLR. Within the first 2 years after surgery, patients who undergo isolated PCLR can be expected to have similar failure rates to patients who undergo combined ligament reconstructions.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)1491-1497
Number of pages7
JournalAmerican Journal of Sports Medicine
Volume52
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s).

Keywords

  • multiligament knee injury
  • posterior cruciate ligament
  • posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
  • registry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Rates of Subjective Failure After Both Isolated and Combined Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Study From the Norwegian Knee Ligament Registry 2004-2021'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this