Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results

Eloisa A De Paula, Lidia Y Tay, Carlos K Kose, Alessandra Mena-Serrano, Alessandra Reis, Jorge Perdigao, Alessandro D Loguercio

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the 6- and 12-month clinical performance of four adhesion strategies from the same manufacturer (Kerr) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Thirty-five patients, with at least four NCCLs each, participated in this study. After samplesize calculation, 180 restorations were assigned to one of the following groups: OFL (Optibond FL), OSP (Optibond Solo Plus), XTR (Optibond XTR), and AIO (Optibond All-In-One). The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months, using both the FDI and the USPHS-modified criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures, ANOVA by rank, and the McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Six restorations (2 for OFL, 1 for OSP, 2 for XTR, and 1 for AIO) were lost at 12 months (P > 0.05 for both evaluation criteria). Marginal staining was observed in seven restorations using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05) and three restorations using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). Eight restorations (2 for OSP, 3 for XTR, and 3 for AIO) were classified as Bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). However, 62 restorations (14 for OFL, 12 for OSP, 15 for XTR, and 21 for AIO) were classified as Bravo using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05). The four adhesion strategies showed similar clinical retention at 6 and 12 months. The FDI evaluation criteria tend to be more sensitive than the USPHS-modified criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)122-145
JournalInternational Journal of Esthetic Dentistry
Volume10
StatePublished - Jan 2015

Fingerprint

tetrachloroisophthalonitrile
United States Public Health Service
Randomized Controlled Trials
Composite Resins
Analysis of Variance
Staining and Labeling
OptiBond Solo Plus
Optibond
OptiBond FL

Cite this

De Paula, E. A., Tay, L. Y., Kose, C. K., Mena-Serrano, A., Reis, A., Perdigao, J., & Loguercio, A. D. (2015). Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results. International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, 10, 122-145.

Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results. / De Paula, Eloisa A; Tay, Lidia Y; Kose, Carlos K; Mena-Serrano, Alessandra; Reis, Alessandra; Perdigao, Jorge; Loguercio, Alessandro D.

In: International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, Vol. 10, 01.2015, p. 122-145.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

De Paula, EA, Tay, LY, Kose, CK, Mena-Serrano, A, Reis, A, Perdigao, J & Loguercio, AD 2015, 'Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results', International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry, vol. 10, pp. 122-145.
De Paula, Eloisa A ; Tay, Lidia Y ; Kose, Carlos K ; Mena-Serrano, Alessandra ; Reis, Alessandra ; Perdigao, Jorge ; Loguercio, Alessandro D. / Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results. In: International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry. 2015 ; Vol. 10. pp. 122-145.
@article{c6f8768db3c84f06b5c7984a0b13facc,
title = "Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results",
abstract = "The aim of this study was to evaluate the 6- and 12-month clinical performance of four adhesion strategies from the same manufacturer (Kerr) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Thirty-five patients, with at least four NCCLs each, participated in this study. After samplesize calculation, 180 restorations were assigned to one of the following groups: OFL (Optibond FL), OSP (Optibond Solo Plus), XTR (Optibond XTR), and AIO (Optibond All-In-One). The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months, using both the FDI and the USPHS-modified criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures, ANOVA by rank, and the McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Six restorations (2 for OFL, 1 for OSP, 2 for XTR, and 1 for AIO) were lost at 12 months (P > 0.05 for both evaluation criteria). Marginal staining was observed in seven restorations using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05) and three restorations using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). Eight restorations (2 for OSP, 3 for XTR, and 3 for AIO) were classified as Bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). However, 62 restorations (14 for OFL, 12 for OSP, 15 for XTR, and 21 for AIO) were classified as Bravo using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05). The four adhesion strategies showed similar clinical retention at 6 and 12 months. The FDI evaluation criteria tend to be more sensitive than the USPHS-modified criteria.",
author = "{De Paula}, {Eloisa A} and Tay, {Lidia Y} and Kose, {Carlos K} and Alessandra Mena-Serrano and Alessandra Reis and Jorge Perdigao and Loguercio, {Alessandro D}",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
language = "English",
volume = "10",
pages = "122--145",
journal = "International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies in cervical lesions: 12-month results

AU - De Paula, Eloisa A

AU - Tay, Lidia Y

AU - Kose, Carlos K

AU - Mena-Serrano, Alessandra

AU - Reis, Alessandra

AU - Perdigao, Jorge

AU - Loguercio, Alessandro D

PY - 2015/1

Y1 - 2015/1

N2 - The aim of this study was to evaluate the 6- and 12-month clinical performance of four adhesion strategies from the same manufacturer (Kerr) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Thirty-five patients, with at least four NCCLs each, participated in this study. After samplesize calculation, 180 restorations were assigned to one of the following groups: OFL (Optibond FL), OSP (Optibond Solo Plus), XTR (Optibond XTR), and AIO (Optibond All-In-One). The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months, using both the FDI and the USPHS-modified criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures, ANOVA by rank, and the McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Six restorations (2 for OFL, 1 for OSP, 2 for XTR, and 1 for AIO) were lost at 12 months (P > 0.05 for both evaluation criteria). Marginal staining was observed in seven restorations using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05) and three restorations using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). Eight restorations (2 for OSP, 3 for XTR, and 3 for AIO) were classified as Bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). However, 62 restorations (14 for OFL, 12 for OSP, 15 for XTR, and 21 for AIO) were classified as Bravo using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05). The four adhesion strategies showed similar clinical retention at 6 and 12 months. The FDI evaluation criteria tend to be more sensitive than the USPHS-modified criteria.

AB - The aim of this study was to evaluate the 6- and 12-month clinical performance of four adhesion strategies from the same manufacturer (Kerr) in non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs) using two evaluation criteria. Thirty-five patients, with at least four NCCLs each, participated in this study. After samplesize calculation, 180 restorations were assigned to one of the following groups: OFL (Optibond FL), OSP (Optibond Solo Plus), XTR (Optibond XTR), and AIO (Optibond All-In-One). The composite resin Filtek Supreme Ultra (3M ESPE) was placed incrementally. The restorations were evaluated at baseline, after 6 months, and after 12 months, using both the FDI and the USPHS-modified criteria. Statistical analyses were performed with Friedman repeated measures, ANOVA by rank, and the McNemar test for significance in each pair (α = 0.05). Six restorations (2 for OFL, 1 for OSP, 2 for XTR, and 1 for AIO) were lost at 12 months (P > 0.05 for both evaluation criteria). Marginal staining was observed in seven restorations using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05) and three restorations using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). Eight restorations (2 for OSP, 3 for XTR, and 3 for AIO) were classified as Bravo for marginal adaptation using the USPHS modified criteria (P > 0.05). However, 62 restorations (14 for OFL, 12 for OSP, 15 for XTR, and 21 for AIO) were classified as Bravo using the FDI criteria (P > 0.05). The four adhesion strategies showed similar clinical retention at 6 and 12 months. The FDI evaluation criteria tend to be more sensitive than the USPHS-modified criteria.

M3 - Article

VL - 10

SP - 122

EP - 145

JO - International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry

JF - International Journal of Esthetic Dentistry

ER -