Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies

18-month results

Jorge Perdigao, M. Dutra-Corrêa, C. H C Saraceni, M. T. Ciaramicoli, V. H. Kiyan, C. S. Queiroz

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

43 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Statement of the Problem: With Institutional Review Board approval, 39 patients who needed restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) were enrolled in this study. A total of 125 NCCLs were selected and randomly assigned to four groups: 1) a three-step etch-andrinse adhesive, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA); 2) a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE); 3) a two-step selfetch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond SE (SE, 3M ESPE); and 4) a one-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE). A nanofilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Restorations were evaluated at six months and 18 months using modified U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) parameters. Results: At six months after initial placement, 107 restorations (85.6% recall rate) were evaluated. At 18 months, 94 restorations (75.2% recall rate) were available for evaluation. The 6 mo/18 mo overall retention rates (%) were 100/90.9 for MP; 100/91.7 for SB; 100/90.9 for SE; and 96.4/92.3 for EB with no statistical difference between any pair of groups at each recall. Sensitivity to air decreased significantly for all adhesives from the preoperative to the postoperative stage and was stable thereafter. Interfacial staining did not change statistically from baseline to six months; however, interfacial staining at the enamel margins was statistically worse at 18 months than at baseline for the two self-etch adhesives EB and SE. Marginal adaptation was statistically worse at 18 months compared with baseline only for EB. This tendency was already significant at the six-month recall. Conclusion: Although 18-month retention was similar for the different adhesion strategies, enamel marginal deficiencies were more prevalent for the self-etch adhesives.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)3-11
Number of pages9
JournalOperative dentistry
Volume37
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

Adhesives
Randomized Controlled Trials
Dental Enamel
Staining and Labeling
United States Public Health Service
Composite Resins
Research Ethics Committees
Air

Cite this

Perdigao, J., Dutra-Corrêa, M., Saraceni, C. H. C., Ciaramicoli, M. T., Kiyan, V. H., & Queiroz, C. S. (2012). Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. Operative dentistry, 37(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-222-C

Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies : 18-month results. / Perdigao, Jorge; Dutra-Corrêa, M.; Saraceni, C. H C; Ciaramicoli, M. T.; Kiyan, V. H.; Queiroz, C. S.

In: Operative dentistry, Vol. 37, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 3-11.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Perdigao, J, Dutra-Corrêa, M, Saraceni, CHC, Ciaramicoli, MT, Kiyan, VH & Queiroz, CS 2012, 'Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results', Operative dentistry, vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 3-11. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-222-C
Perdigao J, Dutra-Corrêa M, Saraceni CHC, Ciaramicoli MT, Kiyan VH, Queiroz CS. Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results. Operative dentistry. 2012 Jan 1;37(1):3-11. https://doi.org/10.2341/11-222-C
Perdigao, Jorge ; Dutra-Corrêa, M. ; Saraceni, C. H C ; Ciaramicoli, M. T. ; Kiyan, V. H. ; Queiroz, C. S. / Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies : 18-month results. In: Operative dentistry. 2012 ; Vol. 37, No. 1. pp. 3-11.
@article{ea2af82d7d3045739a225138685a0f8c,
title = "Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies: 18-month results",
abstract = "Statement of the Problem: With Institutional Review Board approval, 39 patients who needed restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) were enrolled in this study. A total of 125 NCCLs were selected and randomly assigned to four groups: 1) a three-step etch-andrinse adhesive, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA); 2) a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE); 3) a two-step selfetch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond SE (SE, 3M ESPE); and 4) a one-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE). A nanofilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Restorations were evaluated at six months and 18 months using modified U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) parameters. Results: At six months after initial placement, 107 restorations (85.6{\%} recall rate) were evaluated. At 18 months, 94 restorations (75.2{\%} recall rate) were available for evaluation. The 6 mo/18 mo overall retention rates ({\%}) were 100/90.9 for MP; 100/91.7 for SB; 100/90.9 for SE; and 96.4/92.3 for EB with no statistical difference between any pair of groups at each recall. Sensitivity to air decreased significantly for all adhesives from the preoperative to the postoperative stage and was stable thereafter. Interfacial staining did not change statistically from baseline to six months; however, interfacial staining at the enamel margins was statistically worse at 18 months than at baseline for the two self-etch adhesives EB and SE. Marginal adaptation was statistically worse at 18 months compared with baseline only for EB. This tendency was already significant at the six-month recall. Conclusion: Although 18-month retention was similar for the different adhesion strategies, enamel marginal deficiencies were more prevalent for the self-etch adhesives.",
author = "Jorge Perdigao and M. Dutra-Corr{\^e}a and Saraceni, {C. H C} and Ciaramicoli, {M. T.} and Kiyan, {V. H.} and Queiroz, {C. S.}",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.2341/11-222-C",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "37",
pages = "3--11",
journal = "Operative Dentistry",
issn = "0361-7734",
publisher = "Indiana University School of Dentistry",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Randomized clinical trial of four adhesion strategies

T2 - 18-month results

AU - Perdigao, Jorge

AU - Dutra-Corrêa, M.

AU - Saraceni, C. H C

AU - Ciaramicoli, M. T.

AU - Kiyan, V. H.

AU - Queiroz, C. S.

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Statement of the Problem: With Institutional Review Board approval, 39 patients who needed restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) were enrolled in this study. A total of 125 NCCLs were selected and randomly assigned to four groups: 1) a three-step etch-andrinse adhesive, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA); 2) a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE); 3) a two-step selfetch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond SE (SE, 3M ESPE); and 4) a one-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE). A nanofilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Restorations were evaluated at six months and 18 months using modified U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) parameters. Results: At six months after initial placement, 107 restorations (85.6% recall rate) were evaluated. At 18 months, 94 restorations (75.2% recall rate) were available for evaluation. The 6 mo/18 mo overall retention rates (%) were 100/90.9 for MP; 100/91.7 for SB; 100/90.9 for SE; and 96.4/92.3 for EB with no statistical difference between any pair of groups at each recall. Sensitivity to air decreased significantly for all adhesives from the preoperative to the postoperative stage and was stable thereafter. Interfacial staining did not change statistically from baseline to six months; however, interfacial staining at the enamel margins was statistically worse at 18 months than at baseline for the two self-etch adhesives EB and SE. Marginal adaptation was statistically worse at 18 months compared with baseline only for EB. This tendency was already significant at the six-month recall. Conclusion: Although 18-month retention was similar for the different adhesion strategies, enamel marginal deficiencies were more prevalent for the self-etch adhesives.

AB - Statement of the Problem: With Institutional Review Board approval, 39 patients who needed restoration of noncarious cervical lesions (NCCLs) were enrolled in this study. A total of 125 NCCLs were selected and randomly assigned to four groups: 1) a three-step etch-andrinse adhesive, Adper Scotchbond Multi-Purpose (MP, 3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA); 2) a two-step etch-and-rinse adhesive, Adper Single Bond Plus (SB, 3M ESPE); 3) a two-step selfetch adhesive, Adper Scotchbond SE (SE, 3M ESPE); and 4) a one-step self-etch adhesive, Adper Easy Bond (EB, 3M ESPE). A nanofilled composite resin was used for all restorations. Restorations were evaluated at six months and 18 months using modified U.S. Public Health Service (USPHS) parameters. Results: At six months after initial placement, 107 restorations (85.6% recall rate) were evaluated. At 18 months, 94 restorations (75.2% recall rate) were available for evaluation. The 6 mo/18 mo overall retention rates (%) were 100/90.9 for MP; 100/91.7 for SB; 100/90.9 for SE; and 96.4/92.3 for EB with no statistical difference between any pair of groups at each recall. Sensitivity to air decreased significantly for all adhesives from the preoperative to the postoperative stage and was stable thereafter. Interfacial staining did not change statistically from baseline to six months; however, interfacial staining at the enamel margins was statistically worse at 18 months than at baseline for the two self-etch adhesives EB and SE. Marginal adaptation was statistically worse at 18 months compared with baseline only for EB. This tendency was already significant at the six-month recall. Conclusion: Although 18-month retention was similar for the different adhesion strategies, enamel marginal deficiencies were more prevalent for the self-etch adhesives.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84857231020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84857231020&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.2341/11-222-C

DO - 10.2341/11-222-C

M3 - Article

VL - 37

SP - 3

EP - 11

JO - Operative Dentistry

JF - Operative Dentistry

SN - 0361-7734

IS - 1

ER -