Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Radical redesign of nursing homes: Applying the Green House concept in Tupelo, Mississippi

  • Judith Rabig
  • , William Thomas
  • , Rosalie A Kane
  • , Lois J. Cutler
  • , Steve McAlilly

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Purpose: We present the concept of the Green House, articulated by William Thomas as a radically changed, "deinstitutionalized" nursing home well before its first implementation, and we describe and discuss implications from the first Green Houses in Tupelo, Mississippi. Design and Methods: Green Houses are small, self-contained houses for 10 or fewer elders, each with private rooms and full bathrooms and sharing family-style communal space, including hearth, dining area, and full kitchen. Line staff at the level of certified nursing assistants, called Shahbazim, are "universal workers," who cook meals, do laundry, provide personal care, assist with habilitation, and promote the elders' quality of life. Nurses, doctors, and other professionals comprise a visiting clinical support team for the residents and Shahbazim. Multiple Green Houses comprise a nursing home, meeting all nursing facility regulations and working within state-reimbursement levels. In 2003, four Green Houses were built on the campus of a retirement community; in June of that year, 40 residents relocated from the 140-bed nursing home to the Green Houses, including 20 residents previously living in the locked dementia unit. Results: Experiences to date are positive for residents, family, and staff. The sponsor is converting the entire facility to Green Houses, and other providers around the country plan to implement Green House variants. Implications: Because nursing home stock is aging, many physical plants are or soon will be slated for major rebuilding, thereby providing sponsors with an opportunity to consider Green Houses. Early experience suggests that Green Houses are feasible and that outcomes are likely to be positive, and it also suggests that there are some potential issues to overcome in such a dramatic reengineering of nursing homes.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)533-539
Number of pages7
JournalGerontologist
Volume46
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2006

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We thank the Fan Fox Samuels Foundation and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation for supporting the evolution of the Green House idea and the Green House Project; the Hulda B. and Maurice L. Rothschild Foundation for supporting the development of the Green House video; and the Commonwealth Fund for supporting the research on the feasibility of the model. Dr. Thomas’s work was made possible in part through an ASHOKA fellowship. Author Judith Rabig, former director of the National Green House Project has moved to Jude Rabig Consulting since this article was written. Address correspondence to Judith Rabig, RN, MA, Jude Rabig Consulting, 251 East 77th Street, New York, NY 10021. E-mail: [email protected] 1National Green House Project, New York, NY. 2Center for Growing and Becoming, Sherburne NY. 3School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. 4Mississippi Methodist Senior Services, Tupelo, MS.

Keywords

  • Deinstitutionalization
  • Design
  • Habilitation
  • Nursing facilities
  • Quality of life

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radical redesign of nursing homes: Applying the Green House concept in Tupelo, Mississippi'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this